← Search

Michelle Isidro

Seattle, WA
0.0 year-end
50 matches · 27W–23L · seasons 2019–2020
Where Michelle sits
176
2.5
1468
3.0
1702
3.5
1076
4.0
441
4.5
72
5.0

Michelle is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4935. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Michelle has been a steady 3.0 across all 2 seasons on record.

2.53.020192020

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Michelle has gone from the 65th to the 41st percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2020.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
59.1%
13W–9L · 54.2% of games
3.5
54.5%
6W–5L · 52.7% of games
7.0mixed
50%
8W–8L · 52.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history50 matches
L
2020-02-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Meisner
−0.069below expectation — took 38% of games against 65% expected
6-3, 7-5
L
Juli Rasmussen / Stacy Rivardo
2020-02-22 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Hoene
−0.052below expectation — took 29% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Daniella McGowan / Koleen Morris
2020-02-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Hoene
−0.036below expectation — took 40% of games against 56% expected
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L
Sue Mystkowski / Sasha Moinzadeh
2020-02-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christine Livesay
−0.022below expectation — took 45% of games against 55% expected
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
Lili Chang / Sandra Gurtler
2020-01-25 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Holt
+0.014better than expected — took 59% of games against 52% expected
7-5, 6-4
W
Karen Ellentuck / Diana Lull
2020-01-12 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Holt
+0.021better than expected — took 80% of games against 63% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Lauri Iwasaki / Becky Crain
2020-01-04 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katie Jergens
−0.024below expectation — took 62% of games against 68% expected
7-6, 6-2
W
Lori Harris / CRISTIAN MARTINEZmixed
2019-11-16 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Henrik Hyllested
+0.000better than expected — took 65% of games against 51% expected
6-1, 7-6
L
2019-11-09 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Toutonghi
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 38% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
N/Amixed
2019-10-19 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Henrik Hyllested
+0.000better than expected — took 100% of games against 74% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2019-09-14 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Henrik Hyllested
+0.000about as expected — took 33% of games against 38% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
2019-07-28 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jonathan Lloyd
+0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.