← Search

Anna Tur

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Plainfield, IL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
89 matches · 27W–62L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history89 matches
W
2026-10-10 · NITA E 80W55b Rush Copley-Mitchell · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marilyn Tansey
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-04-26 · NITA W 80W55a Rush Copley-Church/Hartford · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Donna Heinrich
loading the estimate
6-7, 1-4
L
2026-04-18 · NITA W 80W55a Rush Copley-Church/Hartford · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary Ellen Young
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-7
L
2026-04-12 · NITA W 80W55a Rush Copley-Church/Hartford · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Denise Seal
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-11 · NITA W 80W55a Rush Copley-Church/Hartford · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Andrea Church
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-04 · NITA W 80W55a Rush Copley-Church/Hartford · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary Ellen Young
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-07 · NITA W 80W55a Rush Copley-Church/Hartford · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary Ellen Young
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-02-01 · NITA W 80W55a Rush Copley-Church/Hartford · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Zagorka James
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-01-25 · NITA W 80W55a Rush Copley-Church/Hartford · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Andrea Church
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-7
L
2025-11-22 · NITA E 80W55b Rush Copley-Mitchell/Church · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Denise Seal
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-11-16 · NITA E 80W55b Rush Copley-Mitchell/Church · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marilyn Tansey
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-10-19 · NITA E 80W55b Rush Copley-Mitchell/Church · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Zagorka James
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
50%
15W–15L · 51% of games
7.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5
50%
4W–4L · 48.3% of games
8.0
15.6%
5W–27L · 38.4% of games
8.0mixed
12.5%
2W–14L · 35.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 46% of the time
#3 Doubles
46%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
29 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
19 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova