← Search

William Shelley

— year-end
10 matches · 3W–7L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add William Shelley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history10 matches
W
2026-04-22 · PBlandford (Mountainbrook) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heyward Bouknight
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-04-08 · PBlandford (Mountainbrook) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Claud Grigg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-01 · PBlandford (Mountainbrook) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patrick Blandford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-11 · PBlandford (Mountainbrook) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heyward Bouknight
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-03-04 · PBlandford (Mountainbrook) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matt Wolski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2025-10-02 · BShamanis (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Benjamin Shamanis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2025-09-18 · BShamanis (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brandon Thio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2025-09-04 · BShamanis (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brandon Thio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-08-21 · BShamanis (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Atiba Rodriguez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-07-24 · BShamanis (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Thomas Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
Teams5 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
20%
1W–4L · 48% of games
7.5
50%
2W–2L · 50.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
5 matches
#2 Doubles
40%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova