← Search

Megan Bigbee

Sammamish, WA
3.5C year-end 2023
62 matches · 31W–31L · seasons 2019–2022
Where Megan sits
145
2.5
1349
3.0
1627
3.5
1052
4.0
435
4.5
70
5.0

Megan is one of 1627 women at 3.5 in this cohort of 4678. Levels at or below 3.5 account for 67% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Megan has been a steady 3.5 across all 4 seasons on record.

3.03.52019202020212022

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Megan has gone from the 16th to the 36th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
71.4%
10W–4L · 60.8% of games
3.5
32.3%
10W–21L · 43.4% of games
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
64.3%
9W–5L · 50.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history62 matches
W
Patricia Baughman / Staci Munic
2022-12-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maureen Crover
+0.011about as expected — took 55% of games against 50% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Laura Susskind / Mary Lockrem
2022-12-04 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lori Gill
+0.029better than expected — took 59% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 7-5
W
Gina Orban / Kathryn Tomasino
2022-11-20 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maureen Crover
+0.030better than expected — took 71% of games against 54% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Karin Barnes / Ailee Robertson
2022-11-13 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lori Gill
−0.003about as expected — took 43% of games against 45% expected
6-0, 1-6, 1-0
L
Mary Fox / Wanda Ramos
2022-11-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephania Denton
−0.041below expectation — took 20% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Sanae Chance / Barbara Holmsten
2022-10-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephania Denton
+0.006about as expected — took 44% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2022-06-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicolle Sherwood
−0.073below expectation — took 8% of games against 47% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
2022-05-19 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Wood
−0.005about as expected — took 44% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
Kanjamat Mullally / Alethea Platis
2022-02-26 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sonia Gleadle
−0.038below expectation — took 14% of games against 39% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
Patricia Baughman / Lesley Gagnon
2022-02-05 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dianne Dalton
+0.028better than expected — took 59% of games against 46% expected
7-5, 6-4
L
Karen Marcotte Solimano / Jennifer Ruddell
2022-01-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Hamlik
−0.021below expectation — took 38% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 7-5
W
Jennifer Ruddell / Holly Simmons
2022-01-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sonia Gleadle
+0.034better than expected — took 63% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.