Search

Cammi Libby

Bellevue, WA
3.5C year-end 2024
64 matches · 29W–35L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.18
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 4 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
1%
down to 3.0
99%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Bellevue · 3.5
71 of 96
WA · 3.5
921 of 1209

Cammi is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Cammi has been 3.5 for all 6 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

3.03.5201920212022202320242026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2026 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Cammi has gone from the 37th to the 38th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
47.4%
18W–20L · 48.5% of games
7.0
37.5%
9W–15L · 45.9% of games
7.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history64 matches
L
2026-03-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shubkarman Randhawa
0.037below expectation — took 33% of games against 52% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-01-25 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Annika Andrews
0.044below expectation — took 20% of games against 45% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Jessica Gigot / Andria Bronson
2026-01-18 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Annika Andrews
+0.023better than expected — took 45% of games against 37% expected
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-01-03 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Asha DSouza
0.010below expectation — took 33% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2024-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Perkins
+0.005better than expected — took 68% of games against 62% expected
7-5, 6-1
L
2024-05-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christie Ritchie
0.000about as expected — took 41% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 7-5
W
2024-05-01 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Monika Jackson
0.004about as expected — took 53% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2024-04-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrea Snyder
+0.052better than expected — took 71% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2024-04-22 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cindy Coakley
+0.001about as expected — took 38% of games against 42% expected
3-6, 3-4
W
Elizabeth Carson / Angelisa Paladin
2024-04-19 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christie Ritchie
+0.026better than expected — took 52% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2024-04-15 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Monika Jackson
+0.008about as expected — took 41% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 7-6
W
Suzanne Monson / Janine Dunbar
2024-04-04 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jane Thomas
+0.003about as expected — took 50% of games against 50% expected
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.