Search

Sarah Yu

Portland, OR
0.0 year-end
48 matches · 33W–15L · seasons 20192022
Where Sarah sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Sarah is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Sarah has been 4.0 for all 4 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.54.02019202020212022

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2021 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Sarah has gone from the 55th to the 35th percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
81.2%
13W–3L · 63.3% of games
4.0
63.2%
12W–7L · 51% of games
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 39.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history48 matches
W
2022-06-12 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Carrato
+0.015better than expected — took 63% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2022-06-05 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Carrato
0.038below expectation — took 40% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Kara Gajowskyj / Mary Taylor
2022-05-22 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Carrato
0.011below expectation — took 52% of games against 58% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2022-05-13 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Carrato
0.062below expectation — took 29% of games against 59% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
2022-04-10 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeanne-Sarah DeLarquier
+0.008about as expected — took 52% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2022-03-27 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Aleina Tanabe
0.005below expectation — took 25% of games against 34% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
2022-03-13 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Aleina Tanabe
+0.007about as expected — took 54% of games against 51% expected
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
Shannon Berry / Jopie van Hameren
2022-03-05 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Davis
+0.083better than expected — took 92% of games against 48% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
2022-02-06 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Carrato
+0.002about as expected — took 45% of games against 47% expected
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L
2022-01-16 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Davis
0.025below expectation — took 29% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2022-01-14 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Justin Levinsohn
+0.000below expectation — took 44% of games against 57% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2021-10-31 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jered Cuenco
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 44% expected
6-1, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.