Search

Shawna Ader

GIG HARBOR, WA
0.0 year-end
46 matches · 14W–32L · seasons 20192022
Where Shawna sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Shawna is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Shawna has been 4.5 for all 4 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

4.04.52019202020212022

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2022 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Shawna has gone from the 30th to the 13th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2021.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
4.5
32.4%
12W–25L · 42.8% of games
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history46 matches
L
Anne Winter / Regina Lindsaychamps
2022-10-07 · #3 Doubles · with Christine Yang
+0.006better than expected — took 58% of games against 53% expected
7-5, 0-6, 1-0
L
2022-08-13 · #1 Doubles · with Anna Deliganis
+0.008below expectation — took 20% of games against 28% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2022-06-05 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Terra Yara
+0.011better than expected — took 75% of games against 64% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2022-05-15 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Erin Shigaki
0.051below expectation — took 38% of games against 60% expected
7-6, 6-2
L
2021-09-05 · #3 Doubles · with Hao Dang
0.009below expectation — took 14% of games against 30% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
Benjamin Killey / Kimberly Nortonmixed
2021-08-15 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Hao Dang
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 44% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Rachael Mitchell / Sean Kellymixed
2021-07-11 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Ross Laursen
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 68% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
2021-04-10 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Anette Pedersen
+0.043better than expected — took 71% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2021-04-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cheryl Farnham
0.006below expectation — took 29% of games against 37% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
2021-04-02 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Anette Pedersen
0.081below expectation — took 0% of games against 45% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Jill Queen / Sarah Footh
2021-03-28 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kay Lorrain
+0.022better than expected — took 47% of games against 38% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2021-03-27 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cheryl Farnham
0.030below expectation — took 14% of games against 36% expected
6-0, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.