← Search

Lee O'Conner

Las Vegas, NV
0.0 year-end
48 matches · 22W–26L · seasons 2019–2020
Where Lee sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Lee is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Lee has been a steady 3.0 across all 2 seasons on record.

2.53.020192020

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Lee has gone from the 30th to the 42nd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2020.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level1 levels played
3.0
45.8%
22W–26L · 48.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history48 matches
W
2020-10-31 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Samantha Torres
+0.004about as expected — took 52% of games against 51% expected
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L
Amber Candelaria / Bing Zou
2020-10-10 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Samantha Torres
−0.024below expectation — took 14% of games against 34% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
Jeannie Collins / Courtney Casem
2020-10-03 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill Kreston
−0.040below expectation — took 20% of games against 43% expected
6-0, 6-3
W
2020-09-26 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill Kreston
+0.011about as expected — took 53% of games against 49% expected
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
Martha Langer / Xin Wei
2020-08-31 · #3 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill Kreston
−0.023about as expected — took 75% of games against 75% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
2020-08-10 · #3 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Dana Kuykendall
−0.037below expectation — took 50% of games against 65% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2020-08-08 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Judith Milligan
+0.001about as expected — took 38% of games against 40% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
Bing Zou / Rachel Lamb
2020-07-20 · #2 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill Kreston
−0.045below expectation — took 20% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Maria Lowry / Norma Harley
2020-07-18 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dana Kuykendall
−0.053below expectation — took 33% of games against 58% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Shellene Goudge / Rose Tucker
2020-07-13 · #3 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill Kreston
−0.018about as expected — took 59% of games against 64% expected
6-4, 7-5
W
2020-07-11 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill Kreston
+0.004better than expected — took 80% of games against 69% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
2020-07-06 · #1 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Judith Milligan
−0.030about as expected — took 75% of games against 77% expected
6-4, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.