← Search

Stephan Foels

Las Vegas, NV
0.0 year-end
70 matches · 39W–31L · seasons 2019–2022

Captains: add Stephan Foels to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history70 matches
L
2022-06-14 · #3 Doubles · with Anthony Osibov championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2022-05-21 · SPANISH OAKS #1 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Colbey Young
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
L
2022-05-07 · SPANISH OAKS #1 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pankaj Bisht
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2022-04-23 · SPANISH OAKS #1 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Colbey Young
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2022-03-19 · SPANISH OAKS #1 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pankaj Bisht
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2022-03-05 · SPANISH OAKS #1 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Colbey Young
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2022-02-19 · SPANISH OAKS #1 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pankaj Bisht
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2022-02-12 · SPANISH OAKS #1 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephen DeGuzman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2022-01-29 · SPANISH OAKS #1 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pankaj Bisht
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2022-01-22 · SPANISH OAKS #1 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephen DeGuzman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2022-01-15 · SPANISH OAKS #1 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephen DeGuzman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2021-11-06 · SPANISH OAKS · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jayden Atkin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2020–2022
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
56.7%
34W–26L · 53.2% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 37% of the time
#3 Doubles
37%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
23 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
13 matches
#1 Male Doubles
4%
3 matches
#3 Male Doubles
4%
3 matches
#2 Male Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert