← Search

Stephan Foels

Las Vegas, NV
0.0 year-end
70 matches · 39W–31L · seasons 2019–2022
Where Stephan sits
65
2.5
683
3.0
1159
3.5
856
4.0
395
4.5
67
5.0

Stephan is one of 0 men at 0.0 in this cohort of 3225. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Stephan has been 4.0 for all 4 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.54.02019202020212022

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Stephan has gone from the 81st to the 55th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
4.0
56.7%
34W–26L · 53.2% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history70 matches
L
Riley Stahley / Ryan Vannahchamps
2022-06-14 · #3 Doubles · with Anthony Osibov
−0.006below expectation — took 25% of games against 35% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Nick Snow / Kendall Stowe
2022-05-21 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Colbey Young
+0.005better than expected — took 68% of games against 62% expected
7-6, 6-0
L
Marco Borremans / Michael Borenstein
2022-05-07 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pankaj Bisht
+0.033better than expected — took 50% of games against 37% expected
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
Jonathan Rodriguez / Chico Delossantos
2022-04-23 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Colbey Young
+0.041better than expected — took 67% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Teo Tabar / Parminder Kang
2022-03-19 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pankaj Bisht
−0.040below expectation — took 53% of games against 67% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
Edward Song / Kirk Howser
2022-03-05 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Colbey Young
−0.025below expectation — took 33% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Russell Boone / Sandy Milmeister
2022-02-19 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pankaj Bisht
−0.016about as expected — took 53% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
KRISTON QUALLS / Vincent Tessier
2022-02-12 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephen DeGuzman
+0.004about as expected — took 52% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
Ryan Vannah / Larry Tombari
2022-01-29 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pankaj Bisht
+0.006about as expected — took 40% of games against 39% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2022-01-22 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephen DeGuzman
−0.042below expectation — took 35% of games against 55% expected
7-5, 6-2
W
Chad Poopat / Patrick Stover
2022-01-15 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephen DeGuzman
−0.010better than expected — took 80% of games against 73% expected
6-0, 6-3
W
2021-11-06 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jayden Atkin
−0.005about as expected — took 59% of games against 59% expected
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.