← Search

Philip Rezek

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
76 matches · 22W–54L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Philip Rezek to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history76 matches
L
2026-03-14 · TCSP-Cornwall · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mark Merkelbach
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-21 · TCSP-Cornwall · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mike Kelley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-02-13 · TCSP-Cornwall · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mike Kelley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-01-10 · TCSP-Cornwall · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Randall Cornwall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
2025-06-01 · TCSP-James · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Matthew Aalfs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2025-04-05 · TCSP-James · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Matthew Aalfs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2025-03-29 · TCSP-James · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joseph Lampitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2024-11-10 · TCSP-Cougars Fall 2024-Smith · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Ford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2024-10-06 · TCSP-Cougars Fall 2024-Smith · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bruce James
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2024-10-05 · Rezek · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
L
2024-09-21 · TCSP-Cougars Fall 2024-Smith · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matthew Aalfs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2024-09-15 · Rezek · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
30.5%
18W–41L · 44.5% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
40%
2W–3L · 43.6% of games
7.0
25%
2W–6L · 42.9% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
37 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
13 matches
#1 Singles
5%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe