Search

Philip Rezek

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
76 matches · 22W–54L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.81
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 4 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
99%
stay 3.0
1%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.0
117 of 144
WA · 3.0
568 of 755

Philip is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Philip has been a steady 3.0 across all 8 seasons on record.

2.53.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2026 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Philip has gone from the 24th to the 30th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
30.5%
18W–41L · 44.5% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
40%
2W–3L · 43.6% of games
7.0
25%
2W–6L · 42.9% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history76 matches
L
Mike Capretta / Hy Mai
2026-03-14 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mark Merkelbach
0.035below expectation — took 33% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Ken Duffie / Drew Baldwin
2026-02-21 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mike Kelley
0.020below expectation — took 41% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-02-13 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mike Kelley
0.009below expectation — took 25% of games against 36% expected
6-4, 6-0
W
Clement Ifrim / Bo Zhang
2026-01-10 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Randall Cornwall
+0.023better than expected — took 47% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
Stephen Daniel / Li Wang
2025-06-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Matthew Aalfs
0.003below expectation — took 25% of games against 34% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
Venu Subramanyam / Jeremy Collins
2025-04-05 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Matthew Aalfs
0.012below expectation — took 41% of games against 47% expected
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
Matt Youngquist / Robert Holmgren
2025-03-29 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joseph Lampitt
0.055below expectation — took 20% of games against 50% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
Hasnain Syed / Jon Bonnelle
2024-11-10 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Ford
+0.029better than expected — took 50% of games against 38% expected
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2024-10-06 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bruce James
+0.006about as expected — took 29% of games against 33% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Younes Nouri
2024-10-05 · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.002below expectation — took 28% of games against 35% expected
7-5, 6-0
L
Randal Blue / James Bolton
2024-09-21 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matthew Aalfs
+0.020better than expected — took 40% of games against 35% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Dechuan Zhuang
2024-09-15 · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.046below expectation — took 14% of games against 41% expected
6-1, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.