← Search

Diane Langstraat

Seattle, WA
0.0 year-end
41 matches · 26W–15L · seasons 2019–2024
Where Diane sits
145
2.5
1349
3.0
1627
3.5
1052
4.0
435
4.5
70
5.0

Diane is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4678. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Diane has been a steady 3.5 across all 6 seasons on record.

3.03.5201920202021202220232024

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2024 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Diane has gone from the 81st to the 75th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
100%
7W–0L · 72.9% of games
3.5
61.1%
11W–7L · 56.2% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 54.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history41 matches
W
2024-02-02 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Bouscaren
+0.004better than expected — took 67% of games against 61% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2023-11-19 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Boyd
−0.020below expectation — took 14% of games against 33% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
Ara Sleeth
2023-05-18 · #2 Singles · 4.0
+0.035about as expected — took 14% of games against 13% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
2023-04-28 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Owens
+0.037better than expected — took 39% of games against 29% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2023-02-17 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Bouscaren
+0.012better than expected — took 75% of games against 63% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Kathy Lee / Pamela Schwartz
2023-02-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Owens
−0.061below expectation — took 47% of games against 71% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2023-01-21 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julia Clarke
−0.039below expectation — took 33% of games against 53% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2023-01-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julia Clarke
−0.000about as expected — took 45% of games against 45% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2022-06-12 · #3 Doubles · with Ingrid Jarvis
−0.018below expectation — took 35% of games against 45% expected
7-5, 6-2
W
Julie Stutz / Cheryl Capriolachamps
2022-06-11 · #3 Doubles · with Ingrid Jarvis
+0.031better than expected — took 57% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 7-6
W
2022-05-19 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Jones
−0.020about as expected — took 71% of games against 71% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
Nancy A Smith / Beth Flume
2022-04-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Willemijn de Clercq
+0.010better than expected — took 62% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 7-6
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.