Search

Emily Jones

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2024
39 matches · 10W–29L · seasons 20192024
Where Emily sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Emily is one of 1173 women at 3.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 3.0 account for 30% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Emily has played at 3.0, 2.5 across 6 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

2.02.53.0201920202021202220232024

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020, 2021 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Emily has gone from the 4th to the 2nd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
2.5
50%
3W–3L · 53.8% of games
3.0
13.6%
3W–19L · 32.2% of games
6.0mixed
25%
2W–6L · 39.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history39 matches
L
2024-08-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Large
0.001about as expected — took 33% of games against 38% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2024-08-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Large
+0.022about as expected — took 29% of games against 28% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2024-07-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Large
+0.008about as expected — took 48% of games against 44% expected
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2024-07-13 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Sienko
+0.017about as expected — took 29% of games against 30% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2024-06-17 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Sienko
+0.014below expectation — took 20% of games against 25% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
Kristina Baker / THAO VAN
2024-03-24 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Milenka Coltman
+0.022about as expected — took 25% of games against 26% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2024-03-09 · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.003below expectation — took 14% of games against 28% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
Erin Keyser / MICHELLE LY
2024-02-10 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marcy Patton
0.019below expectation — took 14% of games against 33% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
Rachel Medrano / Carey Silverstein
2024-01-27 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Linda Falvey
+0.032better than expected — took 52% of games against 40% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2023-05-20 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christin Harrington
+0.012about as expected — took 32% of games against 32% expected
6-1, 7-5
L
Robyn Hilden / MICHELLE LY
2023-05-13 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Large
0.025below expectation — took 20% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2023-02-04 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joel Naumoff
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.