Search

Lisa Bledsoe

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2024
78 matches · 24W–54L · seasons 20192024
Where Lisa sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Lisa is one of 1173 women at 3.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 3.0 account for 30% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Lisa has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 6 seasons — 2 moves up and 2 down.

2.53.03.5201920202021202220232024

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 7.0, Lisa has gone from the 1st to the 5th percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
52.9%
9W–8L · 51.1% of games
3.5
11.1%
2W–16L · 34.1% of games
6.0
55.6%
5W–4L · 45.4% of games
7.0
6.2%
1W–15L · 34.1% of games
6.0mixed
46.7%
7W–8L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history78 matches
L
2024-08-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laurence Dupray
0.022below expectation — took 25% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2024-06-27 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laurence Dupray
+0.008about as expected — took 28% of games against 32% expected
6-0, 7-5
L
Karen Harlow / Jing Li
2024-06-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laurence Dupray
0.043below expectation — took 8% of games against 37% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
2023-10-21 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Priester
0.012below expectation — took 14% of games against 30% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2023-10-14 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sandy Swift
0.036below expectation — took 8% of games against 34% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
2023-10-08 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Priester
0.013below expectation — took 20% of games against 34% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2023-03-19 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Robbins
0.016below expectation — took 25% of games against 38% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2023-02-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debbie Frankel
0.003below expectation — took 33% of games against 38% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2023-01-20 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Floyd
0.034below expectation — took 20% of games against 41% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2022-10-08 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Johnson
+0.016better than expected — took 59% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 0-6, 1-0
W
Ann Burns / Judith Brauer
2022-10-01 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Johnson
+0.050better than expected — took 75% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Allie Mauck
2022-03-13 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.002below expectation — took 8% of games against 22% expected
6-0, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.