Search

Michael Cobb

Lake Oswego, OR
4.0C year-end 2023
58 matches · 36W–22L · seasons 20192024
Where Michael sits
65
2.5
683
3.0
1159
3.5
856
4.0
395
4.5
67
5.0

Michael is one of 856 men at 4.0 in this cohort of 3225. Levels at or below 4.0 account for 86% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Teams15 teams · 2017–2024
SHC-Kang/Anderson
2024 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Men
2024
SHC-Tracy
2023 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Men
2023
SHC-Cobb/Daniels
2023 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Men
2023
SHC-Cobb/Daniels
2022 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Men
2022
SHC-Cosart/Pulaski
2022 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Men
2022
GFU-Daugherty
2022 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed
2022
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Michael has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 6 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.03.54.0201920202021202220232024

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2024 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Michael has gone from the 23rd to the 22nd percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
83.3%
15W–3L · 66.2% of games
4.0
21.1%
4W–15L · 43.4% of games
7.0mixed
100%
8W–0L · 68.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history58 matches
W
2024-02-18 · SHC-Kang/Anderson · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dan Tracy
+0.003about as expected — took 62% of games against 59% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
Brian McDonagh / Sam Kallevig
2024-01-28 · SHC-Kang/Anderson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Noah Trubo
0.027below expectation — took 25% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2023-05-21 · SHC-Tracy · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brenner Daniels
+0.007about as expected — took 52% of games against 48% expected
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2023-05-13 · SHC-Tracy · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Gettle
0.009below expectation — took 28% of games against 37% expected
7-5, 6-0
W
N/A
2023-04-23 · SHC-Tracy · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Gettle
0.012better than expected — took 100% of games against 87% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2023-04-15 · SHC-Tracy · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bill Christensen
0.017below expectation — took 25% of games against 38% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2023-02-11 · SHC-Cobb/Daniels · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Gettle
+0.014about as expected — took 38% of games against 36% expected
7-6, 6-2
L
2023-01-22 · SHC-Cobb/Daniels · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Gettle
+0.053better than expected — took 48% of games against 29% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2023-01-14 · SHC-Cobb/Daniels · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brenner Daniels
0.005below expectation — took 33% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2022-06-05 · SHC-Cobb/Daniels · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Roger Dehoog
0.033below expectation — took 14% of games against 37% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
2022-05-15 · SHC-Cobb/Daniels · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Gettle
+0.054better than expected — took 54% of games against 35% expected
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2022-04-22 · SHC-Cobb/Daniels · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brenner Daniels
+0.049better than expected — took 53% of games against 33% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.