← Search

Chris Serwold

Edmonds, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
70 matches · 26W–44L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Chris Serwold to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history70 matches
W
N/A
2026-02-15 · HBSQ-Abernathy · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-01-31 · HBSQ-Abernathy · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Darrel Rich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-01-10 · HBSQ-Abernathy · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Willem Mager
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-01-04 · HBSQ-Abernathy · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Darrel Rich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2025-11-01 · HBSQ-Rich 55 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mike Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-10-26 · HBSQ-Rich 55 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Martin O'Leary
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-09-28 · HBSQ-Rich 55 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bruce Jahnke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2025-09-20 · HBSQ-Rich 55 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mike Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-09-07 · HBSQ-Rich 55 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mike Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-05-31 · HBSQ-Frog and Volley-Rich · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Martin O'Leary
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-05-18 · HBSQ-Frog and Volley-Rich · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Matt Gettmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2025-04-26 · HBSQ-Frog and Volley-Rich · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
36.7%
22W–38L · 42.4% of games
6.0
40%
4W–6L · 42.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
35 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
7 matches
#2 Singles
7%
5 matches
#1 Singles
6%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe