← Search

Philip Gusterson

Las Vegas, NV
3.5C year-end 2023
184 matches · 122W–62L · seasons 2019–2023
Where Philip sits
65
2.5
683
3.0
1159
3.5
856
4.0
395
4.5
67
5.0

Philip is one of 1159 men at 3.5 in this cohort of 3225. Levels at or below 3.5 account for 59% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Philip has been 3.5 for all 5 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

3.03.520192020202120222023

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Philip has gone from the 63rd to the 73rd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
3.0
87.5%
14W–2L · 69.3% of games
3.5
66%
66W–34L · 56.4% of games
5.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
66.7%
10W–5L · 59.1% of games
6.5mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 57.7% of games
7.0mixed
40%
8W–12L · 47.1% of games
7.5mixed
63.6%
7W–4L · 51.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history184 matches
L
2023-04-29 · #1 Singles · 3.5
−0.031below expectation — took 37% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Jason Glick
2023-04-22 · #1 Singles · 3.5
−0.022below expectation — took 59% of games against 65% expected
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
Jon Afalla
2023-04-15 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.094better than expected — took 75% of games against 34% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
Joshua Mikhael Co
2023-04-01 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.069better than expected — took 75% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
Vincent Sciame
2023-03-25 · #1 Singles · 3.5
−0.022below expectation — took 32% of games against 44% expected
7-6, 6-0
W
Brad Evans
2023-03-18 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.015better than expected — took 71% of games against 60% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Shannan Ohlson / COLE BORENmixed
2023-03-12 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hayley Rodes
+0.000below expectation — took 41% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
2023-02-05 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hayley Rodes
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 59% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Kelly McPherson / Richard van Diepenmixed
2023-01-22 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hayley Rodes
+0.000better than expected — took 56% of games against 47% expected
7-5, 7-6
L
Josephine McPeak / Brian Sandersmixed
2023-01-15 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paige Song
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 49% expected
6-0, 6-3
W
Hoiman Kuan
2022-12-10 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.027better than expected — took 86% of games against 65% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Qing Guo / John Shook
2022-12-03 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeff Liang
+0.006about as expected — took 62% of games against 57% expected
7-5, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.