← Search

Ashlin Nelson

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2024
65 matches · 37W–28L · seasons 2021–2024
Where Ashlin sits
145
2.5
1349
3.0
1627
3.5
1052
4.0
435
4.5
70
5.0

Ashlin is one of 1349 women at 3.0 in this cohort of 4678. Levels at or below 3.0 account for 32% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Ashlin has been a steady 3.0 across all 4 seasons on record.

2.53.02021202220232024

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Ashlin has gone from the 30th to the 85th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
2.5
65%
13W–7L · 56.9% of games
3.0
56.4%
22W–17L · 51.8% of games
3.5
20%
1W–4L · 38.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history65 matches
L
Irene Frazier / Catherine Perez
2024-04-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stacy McDonald
−0.021below expectation — took 25% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Kathryn Sloustcher / Rochelle Hamatian
2024-03-26 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shanna Toft
+0.027better than expected — took 92% of games against 69% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
Moon-Hui Choi / Mary Beth Zamani
2024-03-05 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shanna Toft
+0.002better than expected — took 71% of games against 64% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
Jennifer Covington / Sarah Jane Howell
2024-02-27 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janelle Wells
+0.048better than expected — took 86% of games against 58% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
Jennifer Blais / Danielle Caswell
2024-02-26 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shanna Toft
−0.025below expectation — took 54% of games against 63% expected
7-6, 7-6
W
Alexis Robinson / ANN MARIE WEAVER
2023-11-28 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shanna Toft
−0.010about as expected — took 71% of games against 68% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Jacqueline Brooks / Teri Kerr
2023-10-31 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Edwards
+0.008better than expected — took 71% of games against 62% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2023-10-24 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kaleen Jarman
−0.008below expectation — took 44% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L
Sonya Ladd / Kay Patel
2023-10-17 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katie Kerestesi
+0.001below expectation — took 29% of games against 35% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
Moon-Hui Choi / Annette Bradley
2023-10-10 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Edwards
+0.044better than expected — took 80% of games against 55% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Julie Brown / Melissa Hicks
2023-09-26 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kaleen Jarman
+0.020better than expected — took 45% of games against 38% expected
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2023-09-19 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Edwards
−0.002below expectation — took 20% of games against 31% expected
6-2, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.