Search

Karmalee Yardley

Las Vegas, NV
0.0 year-end
70 matches · 39W–31L · seasons 20192022
Where Karmalee sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Karmalee is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Karmalee has been a steady 4.0 across all 3 seasons on record.

3.54.0201920202021

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Karmalee has gone from the 97th to the 48th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2021.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
4.0
59.4%
19W–13L · 57.8% of games
4.5
25%
2W–6L · 43.4% of games
8.0
60%
12W–8L · 59.3% of games
9.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history70 matches
W
Mary Ford / Tracy Ford
2022-05-19 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Denise Antoniadis
+0.019better than expected — took 52% of games against 45% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2022-05-12 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Beverly Talaat
+0.026better than expected — took 62% of games against 49% expected
7-5, 6-3
W
N/A
2022-04-22 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Belinda Hines
0.079about as expected — took 100% of games against 96% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
2022-03-31 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kelley Morgan
0.003about as expected — took 62% of games against 61% expected
7-6, 6-2
L
2021-05-10 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Tegano
0.034below expectation — took 37% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2021-05-03 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Tegano
+0.003about as expected — took 50% of games against 48% expected
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2021-04-29 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Stephanie Tegano
+0.016better than expected — took 55% of games against 45% expected
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
Janice Hoffman / Julienne Yager
2021-04-26 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Shier
+0.013better than expected — took 63% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Kristi Beezley / Elizabeth McManus
2021-04-19 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Timora Cereghino
0.020below expectation — took 40% of games against 50% expected
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
Jordan Luna / Denise Goshorn
2021-04-12 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Timora Cereghino
+0.018better than expected — took 43% of games against 38% expected
6-4, 7-6
L
2021-04-05 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Tegano
+0.004about as expected — took 43% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
Nora Taylor / Aly Wagonseller
2021-03-25 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jane Marchionne
0.073below expectation — took 14% of games against 53% expected
6-1, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.