Search

Dan Adamson

Las Vegas, NV
0.0 year-end
60 matches · 13W–47L · seasons 20192024
Where Dan sits
73
2.5
775
3.0
1278
3.5
930
4.0
419
4.5
77
5.0

Dan is one of 0 men at 0.0 in this cohort of 3552. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Dan has been a steady 4.0 across all 5 seasons on record.

3.54.020192020202120222023

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2023 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Dan has gone from the 5th to the 8th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
4.0
12.8%
6W–41L · 36.5% of games
6.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0
63.6%
7W–4L · 51.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history60 matches
L
Bill Mooc / Willord Ortanez
2024-04-17 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with George Pietro
0.056below expectation — took 8% of games against 41% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
2024-04-10 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with George Pietro
0.012below expectation — took 33% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2023-01-14 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steve Stewart
0.067below expectation — took 33% of games against 62% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Karl Robinson / Christopher Avino
2023-01-07 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephen Newell
+0.014about as expected — took 37% of games against 35% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Kenneth Le / Rocco Santini
2022-12-03 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Paull
0.032below expectation — took 33% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2022-10-08 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brent Muir
0.001below expectation — took 25% of games against 33% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
Zack Messer / Jason MacDonald
2022-06-04 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Paull
+0.032better than expected — took 50% of games against 37% expected
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
Paul Joncich / Adam Keith
2022-05-01 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brent Muir
+0.094better than expected — took 86% of games against 40% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Matthew Mills / Anthony Taeubel
2022-03-28 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brent Muir
+0.007about as expected — took 55% of games against 52% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2022-02-19 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karl Robinson
0.017below expectation — took 14% of games against 32% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
2022-02-12 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patrick Stover
+0.017better than expected — took 47% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2022-01-22 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Parminder Kang
+0.010about as expected — took 47% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.