← Search

Mariko Miller

Las Vegas, NV
0.0 year-end
52 matches · 25W–27L · seasons 2019–2021
Where Mariko sits
145
2.5
1349
3.0
1627
3.5
1052
4.0
435
4.5
70
5.0

Mariko is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4678. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Mariko has been a steady 3.5 across all 3 seasons on record.

3.03.5201920202021

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Mariko has gone from the 68th to the 33rd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2021.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.5
47.7%
21W–23L · 50.1% of games
7.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 56.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history52 matches
W
2021-12-16 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy Levasseur
+0.011better than expected — took 58% of games against 53% expected
7-5, 7-5
W
2021-11-18 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Schumacher Stine
−0.007better than expected — took 80% of games against 72% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Ara Lee Stimson / Jane Casovan
2021-11-11 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Schumacher Stine
+0.019better than expected — took 65% of games against 54% expected
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
Ann Pham / Laura Larsen
2021-11-03 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rika Cook
+0.054better than expected — took 67% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Dolores Corley / Susan Gray
2021-10-21 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Holland
+0.005about as expected — took 43% of games against 42% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
Tina Morgan / Susan Grady
2021-10-14 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Schumacher Stine
+0.025better than expected — took 48% of games against 38% expected
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W
Heidi Thornhill / Denise Mandelbaum
2021-10-13 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rika Cook
−0.007about as expected — took 52% of games against 56% expected
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
Kami Bowler / Jane Hodges
2021-10-07 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rika Cook
+0.016better than expected — took 55% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
Susan Savage / Sheila Stetts
2021-10-06 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Childs
−0.011below expectation — took 41% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 7-6
W
Jennifer Gleason / Christine Ballard
2021-09-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Chen
−0.003about as expected — took 57% of games against 57% expected
7-6, 6-4
W
Rae Ann Yost / Claudine Tuttle
2021-09-22 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rika Cook
+0.098better than expected — took 92% of games against 42% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
2021-05-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Kindig
+0.020better than expected — took 77% of games against 62% expected
6-2, 4-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.