← Search

Eva Piorkowski

Las Vegas, NV
0.0 year-end
55 matches · 19W–36L · seasons 2019–2021
Where Eva sits
176
2.5
1468
3.0
1702
3.5
1076
4.0
441
4.5
72
5.0

Eva is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4935. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Eva has been a steady 4.0 across all 3 seasons on record.

3.54.0201920202021

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Eva has gone from the 10th to the 16th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2021.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
4.0
25.7%
9W–26L · 41.9% of games
8.0
44.4%
8W–10L · 44.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history55 matches
L
Mary Ford / Aly Wagonseller
2021-11-15 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Debbie Fox
+0.016better than expected — took 44% of games against 39% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2021-11-11 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patty Yamano
−0.021below expectation — took 29% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Holly Dexter / Maria Gonzales
2021-10-23 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Barbara Fair
−0.042below expectation — took 32% of games against 53% expected
7-6, 6-0
W
Sandi Martin / Lauren Monroe
2021-10-18 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kaye Taylor
+0.025better than expected — took 71% of games against 56% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
2021-10-11 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Yuwathida Blonsky
−0.009below expectation — took 33% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Tina Back / Tricia Miller
2021-10-04 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Donna Roulias
−0.000about as expected — took 38% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 7-6
W
Elizabeth Barton / Ritva Porterchamps
2021-10-02 · #3 Doubles · with Karen Regin
−0.005about as expected — took 53% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
Susan Conroy / Sheila Robbinschamps
2021-10-01 · #3 Doubles · with Karen Regin
+0.043better than expected — took 68% of games against 47% expected
7-5, 6-1
L
Esther Tan / Sonia Vermeys
2021-09-27 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Billi Dunning
−0.043below expectation — took 29% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
Lorena Godfrey / Rachel Calderon Young
2021-09-20 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Billi Dunning
+0.009about as expected — took 52% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
Susan DeVito / Caroline Guenther
2021-09-13 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Billi Dunning
+0.040better than expected — took 62% of games against 43% expected
7-6, 6-2
L
Kathryn Garlan / Caroline Walton
2021-08-09 · #1 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Regin
−0.028below expectation — took 25% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.