Search

Linda Paulk

Portland, OR
0.0 year-end
41 matches · 22W–19L · seasons 20192023
Where Linda sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Linda is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Linda has been 4.0 for all 3 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.54.0202020222023

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2022 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 8.0, Linda has gone from the 89th to the 72nd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
4.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 51.2% of games
8.0
60%
9W–6L · 56.3% of games
8.0mixed
41.2%
7W–10L · 43.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history41 matches
W
2023-05-19 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jana Corder
0.006about as expected — took 50% of games against 54% expected
6-1, 0-6, 1-0
L
2023-04-30 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Elliott
+0.007about as expected — took 48% of games against 44% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Jean Herbst / Brenda Bonnell
2023-04-29 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Robertson
+0.011better than expected — took 71% of games against 61% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2023-04-16 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Char Riley
0.038below expectation — took 33% of games against 52% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2023-03-11 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Pete Jacobs
+0.000better than expected — took 55% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2023-03-05 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mark King
+0.000better than expected — took 62% of games against 43% expected
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2022-11-13 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Char Riley
0.057below expectation — took 33% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2022-11-12 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kate Hunter
+0.018about as expected — took 35% of games against 33% expected
7-5, 6-2
W
2022-11-06 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Char Riley
+0.020better than expected — took 63% of games against 53% expected
5-7, 6-0, 1-0
W
2022-10-29 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Char Riley
+0.037better than expected — took 75% of games against 54% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
2022-10-23 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Deirdre Harms
+0.056better than expected — took 80% of games against 50% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Jing Feng / Rahul Chatterjeemixed
2022-10-15 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Keith Johnson
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 65% expected
6-2, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.