← Search

Thomas Sparks

Seattle, WA
0.0 year-end
39 matches · 14W–25L · seasons 2019–2022
Where Thomas sits
79
2.5
852
3.0
1347
3.5
980
4.0
435
4.5
80
5.0

Thomas is one of 0 men at 0.0 in this cohort of 3773. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Thomas has been a steady 3.5 across all 3 seasons on record.

3.03.5202020212022

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Thomas has gone from the 45th to the 41st percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2021.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
42.9%
6W–8L · 50.8% of games
7.0
36.4%
4W–7L · 43% of games
8.0mixed
28.6%
4W–10L · 44.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history39 matches
L
2022-03-04 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Hanses
−0.040below expectation — took 40% of games against 58% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2022-02-11 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Hanses
−0.024below expectation — took 33% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2022-01-28 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eric DeMars
+0.032better than expected — took 75% of games against 57% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
2022-01-23 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eric DeMars
−0.021about as expected — took 71% of games against 71% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Angela Zhang / Andrew Tranmixed
2021-11-13 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Antje Volk
+0.000better than expected — took 47% of games against 27% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2021-11-05 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Stacy Crites
+0.000about as expected — took 33% of games against 31% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2021-10-30 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Antje Volk
+0.000about as expected — took 38% of games against 43% expected
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L
Jacob Mcglashon / Katie Starkmixed
2021-10-02 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Maryse Sparks
+0.000below expectation — took 38% of games against 49% expected
7-6, 6-2
L
2021-09-26 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Maryse Sparks
+0.000about as expected — took 59% of games against 62% expected
0-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Jamie Eng / Brandon Luceromixed
2021-09-18 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Maryse Sparks
+0.000about as expected — took 52% of games against 53% expected
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
Aline Pereira / Vanbasten Maulingcarmixed
2021-09-12 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Maryse Sparks
+0.000below expectation — took 33% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2021-04-23 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gary Renville
+0.017better than expected — took 52% of games against 44% expected
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.