Search

Joshua Hamblin

Oregon City, OR
0.0 year-end
24 matches · 14W–10L · seasons 20192023
Where Joshua sits
65
2.5
683
3.0
1159
3.5
856
4.0
395
4.5
67
5.0

Joshua is one of 0 men at 0.0 in this cohort of 3225. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Teams21 teams · 2004–2023
SHC-Cobb/Daniels
2023 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Men
2023
SHC-Hensley
2023 Mixed 40 & Over · 8.0 Mixed
2023
SHC-Cobb/Daniels
2022 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Men
2022
SHC-Cosart/Pulaski
2022 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Men
2022
CAC-Richardson
2021 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Men
2021
CAC-Richardson
2020 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Men
2020
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Joshua has been 4.0 for all 5 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.54.020192020202120222023

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2021, 2022 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Joshua has gone from the 79th to the 50th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2020.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
4.0
57.9%
11W–8L · 49.5% of games
8.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 49.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history24 matches
W
Ashleigh Kayser / Keith Johnsonmixed
2023-03-05 · SHC-Hensley · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gwen Matthews
+0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 38% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Jennifer Simmons / Jeff Hansonmixed
2023-03-04 · SHC-Hensley · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Amy Murphy
+0.000about as expected — took 41% of games against 45% expected
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2023-03-03 · SHC-Hensley · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Korenek-Leveque
+0.000below expectation — took 8% of games against 41% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
2023-02-04 · SHC-Cobb/Daniels · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dan Tracy
0.003about as expected — took 55% of games against 56% expected
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2023-01-28 · SHC-Hensley · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary Hlady
+0.000better than expected — took 63% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2023-01-14 · SHC-Cobb/Daniels · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Theobald
0.010about as expected — took 54% of games against 58% expected
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2022-05-22 · SHC-Cobb/Daniels · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonathan Caplan
0.023below expectation — took 25% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2022-04-09 · SHC-Cobb/Daniels · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Randy Laylo
0.033below expectation — took 29% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2022-02-26 · SHC-Cosart/Pulaski · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Albert Hensley
0.040below expectation — took 25% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Vimal Natarajan / Ajay Kumar Tippisetti
2022-01-23 · SHC-Cosart/Pulaski · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cam Adrian
0.005about as expected — took 37% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2021-04-17 · CAC-Richardson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jono Neher
0.003about as expected — took 38% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 7-5
W
Huy Pham / Chris Cremer
2021-03-27 · CAC-Richardson · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Richardson
+0.000about as expected — took 59% of games against 58% expected
7-6, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.