Teams

Hjelt TRI18 3.5/3.0/2.5 Mon

2023 Piedmont Tri-Level 18 & Over · 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-07-17vs Bushnell TRI18 3.5/3.0/2.5 MonWon 10
W#1 DoublesKamron Moody / Susan Roach vs Mary Winstead / Amy Kemp6-1, 6-2
2023-07-10vs Meadows TRI18 3.5/3.0/2.5 MonWon 10
W#1 DoublesMadison Bowen / Susan Roach vs Allison Walsh / Melissa Baker6-2, 6-4
2023-07-03Won 10
W#1 DoublesMadison Bowen / Susan Roach vs Stacey Higgins / Martha Farlow6-0, 6-1
W#1 DoublesJen Berlin / Susan Roach vs Julie McPherson / Andrea Thomas6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Madison Bowen
published
3.54
Susan Roach
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.49
Kamron Moody
published
3.40
McLean Achziger
published
3.37
Deirdre Hjelt
published 3.5
3.29
Jen Berlin
published
3.26
Sara Adamson
published
3.12
Kathryn Fleihan
published
3.02
Frida Nordmark
published
2.99
Stephanie Adams
published
2.88
Jennifer Phelps
published
2.79
Raychel Lockwood
published
Nadia Gregory
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kamron Moody + Jen Berlin044 matchesnot enough data
Deirdre Hjelt + Jen Berlin224 matchesnot enough data
Kathryn Fleihan + Kamron Moody123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Madison Bowen
30W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%<1%>99%
3.60
Susan Roach
121W–42L career · 4 lines in 2023
38%61%<1%
3.54
Kamron Moody
18W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%53%47%
3.49
McLean Achziger
25W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%<1%>99%
3.40
3.5
Deirdre Hjelt
54W–22L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%18%
3.37
Jen Berlin
22W–25L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.29
Sara Adamson
25W–14L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.26
Kathryn Fleihan
30W–35L career · no lines in 2023
19%80%<1%
3.12
Frida Nordmark
6W–14L career · no lines in 2023
43%57%<1%
3.02
Stephanie Adams
22W–25L career · no lines in 2023
<1%54%46%
2.99
Jennifer Phelps
3W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
2.88
Raychel Lockwood
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
2.79
Nadia Gregory
13W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.