Teams

Jack Coleman/Nicholson-Carpenter W3.5F

2026 DALLAS TENNIS 40 & Over ADULT W Friday · W3.5F

13 players · average NTRP 3.33 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-02-27vs Gleneagles/Steyn-Priebe W3.5FWon 31
W#1 DoublesJennifer Evans / Julie Forrest vs Denise Whiddon / Judy Newsom7-5, 6-1
W#1 SinglesKatie Pearson vs Andrea Neel6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesCorinne Carpenter / Taylor Nicholson vs LeAnn Priebe / Rachelle Brown3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesEmily Hildebrand / Constance Cherones vs Janis Stevens / Brenda Whatley6-0, 6-0
L#1 DoublesCorinne Carpenter / Jennifer Evans vs Jenifer Mathews / Sarah Snitker4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesKatie Pearson vs Melissa Fox3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesConstance Cherones / Emily Hildebrand vs Gretchen Allen / Jennifer Spoons4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesKristen Merrill / Angela Ray vs Shelley Staten / Kim Henke2-6, 6-7
W#4 DoublesJessica Vonbargen / Charlotte Hayes vs Melanie Powell / Brianna Fluellen7-6, 7-6
2026-02-13vs The Nelson/Stoll W3.5FSplit 11
W#3 DoublesConstance Cherones / Emily Hildebrand vs Beckey Fuller / Aimee Rodriguez4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#4 DoublesChelsea Bailey / Jessica Vonbargen vs Amber James / Heidi Moore0-6, 1-6
2026-02-11vs DCC/Filgo W3.5FWon 32
W#1 DoublesMegan Denton / Corinne Carpenter vs Molly Fernandes / Lindsey Meyer6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKatie Pearson vs Claire Arnot6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesTaylor Nicholson / Constance Cherones vs Courtney Gilbert / Megan Filgo4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKristen Merrill / Emily Hildebrand vs Sarah Klein / Allison Stensrud4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#4 DoublesChelsea Bailey / Jessica Vonbargen vs Leigh Sands / Adair Webb5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2026-02-06vs Greenhill/Lipshy-Oujezdsky W3.5FLost 13
L#1 DoublesCorinne Carpenter / Constance Cherones vs Jana Reist / Margaret Cooley4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesTaylor Nicholson / Julie Forrest vs Stephanie Friedman / Lori Stern3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKristen Merrill / Angela Ray vs Stacia Durham / Emily Mulkey7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#4 DoublesLisa Montgomery / Katie Pearson vs Melissa Lipshy / Francoise Moyes Carnal6-2, 6-4
2026-02-05vs Fretz/Sherwood-Carpenter W3.5FLost 12
L#1 SinglesKatie Pearson vs Becky Sherwood7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesEmily Hildebrand / Taylor Nicholson vs Cynthia Jankovich / Timla Healey3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesConstance Cherones / Charlotte Hayes vs Alexandra Villamarin / Suzanne Chreene4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-01-16vs NTRC/Cole W3.5FSplit 22
L#1 DoublesCorinne Carpenter / Jennifer Evans vs Sandi Silverman / Michelle Claassen5-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesConstance Cherones / Julie Forrest vs Judy Steglich / Chelsea Northam6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJessica Vonbargen / Emily Hildebrand vs Tammi Cole / Sherrie Worthington2-6, 4-6
W#4 DoublesCharlotte Hayes / Lisa Montgomery vs Michelle Smith / Debra Barcuch6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2026-01-09vs High Point/Cavey W3.5FWon 32
W#1 DoublesCorinne Carpenter / Jennifer Evans vs Kelly Britson / Shelley Duron5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKatie Pearson vs Sylvie Lippens6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKristen Merrill / Angela Ray vs Anne Savino / Rebecca Bennett1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJulie Forrest / Taylor Nicholson vs Jennifer Williams / Karin Lyons7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#4 DoublesLisa Montgomery / Jessica Vonbargen vs Avery Cording / Michele Mandell3-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings41 teams · W3.5F
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1The Nelson/Stoll W3.5F8033721252
2Royal Oaks/Copley W3.5F7027823248
3Fretz/Scott-Wood W3.5F7027823267
4Huffines/Howarth W3.5F7027823260
5The Lakes/Fain-Bingham W3.5F61241127284
6The Lakes/Akbany W3.5F61231232301
7Greenhill/Lipshy-Oujezdsky W3.5F62251536334
8Samuell Grand/Kilcullen-Shuff W3.5F52241123243
9Lakewood CC/Huffman-Satterwhite W3.5F52241130273
10Canyon Creek/Dawson W3.5F52231231302
11Lakes at Castle Hills/Lewis-Boronski W3.5F52221332299
12Jack Coleman/Hills-Hutchinson W3.5F52211432255
13Canyon Creek/Whitaker-Mathews W3.5F53241638350
14DCC/Filgo W3.5F53241642341
15DAC/Starnes-Stephanian W3.5F43241127281
16Stonebriar/Anderson-Buster W3.5F43201535308
17NTRC/Hedblom W3.5F43171839348
18Brookhaven/Frenkel-Smercina W3.5F43181740312
19Samuell Grand/Hilliard-Melson W3.5F43181743335
20High Point/Cavey W3.5F44221845353
21Northwood/Pask W3.5F34181739310
22Oak Creek/George-Chiou W3.5F34171840310
23Chandlers Landing/Waldron-Lee W3.5F34161942313
24High Point/Tucker-Itscovitch W3.5F34171842320
25Royal Oaks/Carter W3.5F34152043337
26Stonebridge Ranch/Giacchino-Cantu W3.5F34161944346
27Eldorado/Crockett-Miller W3.5F34152045347
28Jack Coleman/Nicholson-Carpenter W3.5F35182252386
29NTRC/Cole W3.5F35152554396
30McKinney/Johnson-Pavelka W3.5F25171839325
31RGAC/Lucas W3.5F25132247340
32DAC/Frazure-Sisk W3.5F25122348352
33Lakes at Castle Hills/Hooper-Cisneros W3.5F25122350354
34Fretz/Sherwood-Carpenter W3.5F26112964419
35Oak Creek/Kaplan-Grubstein W3.5F16142146333
36Oak Creek/Thornton-Hark W3.5F16122348338
37Wilkerson-Sanders/McKee-Powell W3.5F16112451360
38High Point/Escutia-Gomez W3.5F1682759379
39Lakewood CC/Cook-Adams W3.5F1653063410
40Springpark/Eubanks-Middlebrook W3.5F0733267418
41Gleneagles/Steyn-Priebe W3.5F0883267416

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Corinne Carpenter
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.28
Ashley OMalley
published 3.5
3.28
Constance Cherones
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.26
Katie Pearson
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #4 Doubles 17% · published
3.20
Julie Forrest
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.14
Emily Hildebrand
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Jessica Vonbargen
usually #4 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.10
Charlotte Hayes
usually #3 Doubles 29%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3
3.07
Taylor Nicholson
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.06
Lisa Montgomery
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Kristen Merrill
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.92
Michelle Rehberger
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #4 Doubles 38% · published
2.68
Genniva Bruce
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Taylor Nicholson + Constance Cherones4254% games+12.9% vs expected
Michelle Rehberger + Genniva Bruce111251% games+4.4% vs expected
Constance Cherones + Ashley OMalley4166% gamesnot enough data
Taylor Nicholson + Corinne Carpenter224 matchesnot enough data
Taylor Nicholson + Emily Hildebrand224 matchesnot enough data
Constance Cherones + Emily Hildebrand224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Corinne Carpenter
14W–11L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Ashley OMalley
14W–4L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Constance Cherones
32W–7L career · 7 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.28
Katie Pearson
19W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.26
Julie Forrest
13W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Emily Hildebrand
16W–13L career · 6 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
3.14
Jessica Vonbargen
32W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
15%85%<1%
3.13
3
Charlotte Hayes
10W–3L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%21%79%
3.10
Taylor Nicholson
14W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.07
Lisa Montgomery
4W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.06
Kristen Merrill
10W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
32%67%<1%
3.06
Michelle Rehberger
17W–16L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
2.92
3
Genniva Bruce
16W–18L career · 9 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
2.68

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.