Teams

McKinney/Johnson-Pavelka W3.5F

2026 DALLAS TENNIS 40 & Over ADULT W Friday · W3.5F

15 players · average NTRP 3.42 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#1 DoublesTao Kang / Hong Zhang vs Amy Northrop / Karen Eubanks6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLaura Pavelka / Amy McCaulley vs Becky Burns / Julie Richard6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#4 DoublesLea Ellsworth / Cindy Graham vs Ellen Euting / Elisa Smith6-1, 7-5
2026-02-13vs DAC/Frazure-Sisk W3.5FLost 03
L#2 DoublesHong Zhang / Ronnie Bye vs Amy Timmerman / Catherine Moss6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCindy Graham / Laura Pavelka vs Shannon DeVilbiss / Laura Frazure3-6, 6-7
L#4 DoublesCarrie Martinson / Jody Schueler vs Amy Marable / Jenny Littlefield4-6, 5-7
2026-02-12vs High Point/Tucker-Itscovitch W3.5FLost 12
L#1 DoublesKassandra Fish / Ronnie Bye vs Tricia Ehrisman / Dana Jones2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCindy Graham / Tao Kang vs Deganit Gal / Tara Glotzbach4-6, 4-6
W#4 DoublesLaura Pavelka / Amy McCaulley vs Mary Tucker / Celeste Schmidt6-4, 6-4
2026-02-06vs Oak Creek/George-Chiou W3.5FWon 21
L#2 DoublesMegan Keathley / Cindy Graham vs Nicole Roshto / Tomoko Tanabe3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesKassandra Fish / Shanna Claytor vs Elizabeth George / Emily Simon6-4, 6-3
W#4 DoublesAmy Russo / Jody Schueler vs Cindy Chiou / Lilian Bowari6-4, 7-6
2026-02-05vs The Lakes/Akbany W3.5FSplit 22
W#1 SinglesLaura Pavelka vs Tracy Akbany1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCindy Graham / Ronnie Bye vs Chelsee Glasco / Erika Anderson7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLea Ellsworth / Shanna Claytor vs Cathy Turner / Beth Ann Paone4-6, 3-6
W#4 DoublesTao Kang / Megan Keathley vs Haylee Boyle / Jennifer Byrne6-0, 6-4
2026-01-16vs Fretz/Scott-Wood W3.5FLost 14
L#1 DoublesKatie Johnson / Kassandra Fish vs Rebecca Scott / Angie Wood1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesTao Kang vs Karen Rector6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLaura Pavelka / Amy Russo vs Marianna Clement / Meredith Foster2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCarrie Martinson / Lea Ellsworth vs Susan Coy / Joette Young1-6, 4-6
L#4 DoublesJulie Hansen / Megan Keathley vs Callie Nixon / Cindy Lodewick2-6, 6-7
W#1 DoublesTao Kang / Hong Zhang vs Stephanie Burgard / Kate Walters5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRonnie Bye / Carrie Martinson vs Whitney Huffman / Sara Straley5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKatie Johnson / Rachel Garza vs Lindsey Diaz / Sarah Patterson7-5, 6-3
L#4 DoublesJulie Hansen / Shanna Claytor vs Alexandra Klitsch / Allison Methvin0-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings41 teams · W3.5F
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1The Nelson/Stoll W3.5F8033721252
2Royal Oaks/Copley W3.5F7027823248
3Fretz/Scott-Wood W3.5F7027823267
4Huffines/Howarth W3.5F7027823260
5The Lakes/Fain-Bingham W3.5F61241127284
6The Lakes/Akbany W3.5F61231232301
7Greenhill/Lipshy-Oujezdsky W3.5F62251536334
8Samuell Grand/Kilcullen-Shuff W3.5F52241123243
9Lakewood CC/Huffman-Satterwhite W3.5F52241130273
10Canyon Creek/Dawson W3.5F52231231302
11Lakes at Castle Hills/Lewis-Boronski W3.5F52221332299
12Jack Coleman/Hills-Hutchinson W3.5F52211432255
13Canyon Creek/Whitaker-Mathews W3.5F53241638350
14DCC/Filgo W3.5F53241642341
15DAC/Starnes-Stephanian W3.5F43241127281
16Stonebriar/Anderson-Buster W3.5F43201535308
17NTRC/Hedblom W3.5F43171839348
18Brookhaven/Frenkel-Smercina W3.5F43181740312
19Samuell Grand/Hilliard-Melson W3.5F43181743335
20High Point/Cavey W3.5F44221845353
21Northwood/Pask W3.5F34181739310
22Oak Creek/George-Chiou W3.5F34171840310
23Chandlers Landing/Waldron-Lee W3.5F34161942313
24High Point/Tucker-Itscovitch W3.5F34171842320
25Royal Oaks/Carter W3.5F34152043337
26Stonebridge Ranch/Giacchino-Cantu W3.5F34161944346
27Eldorado/Crockett-Miller W3.5F34152045347
28Jack Coleman/Nicholson-Carpenter W3.5F35182252386
29NTRC/Cole W3.5F35152554396
30McKinney/Johnson-Pavelka W3.5F25171839325
31RGAC/Lucas W3.5F25132247340
32DAC/Frazure-Sisk W3.5F25122348352
33Lakes at Castle Hills/Hooper-Cisneros W3.5F25122350354
34Fretz/Sherwood-Carpenter W3.5F26112964419
35Oak Creek/Kaplan-Grubstein W3.5F16142146333
36Oak Creek/Thornton-Hark W3.5F16122348338
37Wilkerson-Sanders/McKee-Powell W3.5F16112451360
38High Point/Escutia-Gomez W3.5F1682759379
39Lakewood CC/Cook-Adams W3.5F1653063410
40Springpark/Eubanks-Middlebrook W3.5F0733267418
41Gleneagles/Steyn-Priebe W3.5F0883267416

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Tao Kang
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.48
Cristin Pike
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.44
Becky Connet
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #4 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.33
Laura Pavelka
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #4 Doubles 20% · published
3.33
Ronnie Bye
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.21
Kassandra Fish
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.14
Lea Ellsworth
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
3.14
Jody Schueler
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Amy McCaulley
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.12
Carrie Martinson
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.09
Shanna Claytor
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
3.06
Rachel Garza
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Cindy Graham
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #4 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.01
Amy Russo
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #4 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.96
Megan Keathley
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Pavelka + Kassandra Fish5260% games+12.5% vs expected
Cindy Graham + Lea Ellsworth224 matchesnot enough data
Carrie Martinson + Lea Ellsworth224 matchesnot enough data
Laura Pavelka + Amy Russo213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tao Kang
26W–18L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%35%65%
3.56
3.5
Cristin Pike
11W–20L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Becky Connet
42W–34L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.44
Laura Pavelka
29W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
Ronnie Bye
8W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
Kassandra Fish
69W–60L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
Lea Ellsworth
13W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
3.14
Jody Schueler
11W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Amy McCaulley
3W–2L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
3.13
3.5
Carrie Martinson
16W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.12
Shanna Claytor
31W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
25%74%<1%
3.09
Rachel Garza
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.06
3.5
Cindy Graham
22W–17L career · 5 lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
3.05
3
Amy Russo
28W–17L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.01
Megan Keathley
3W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
63%37%<1%
2.96

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.