Teams

Canyon Creek/Dawson W3.5F

2026 DALLAS TENNIS 40 & Over ADULT W Friday · W3.5F

18 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-02-20vs Royal Oaks/Copley W3.5FLost 04
L#1 SinglesLeah Collins vs Kelley Green1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesApril Moeser / Joy Pressly vs Erin Copley / Amy Benson7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKatherine Dreyer / Michele Gurley vs Lisa Wallace / Fran Matise3-6, 5-7
L#4 DoublesSusan Hansen / Jill Kennedy vs Melissa Peticolas / Liza Schlitt1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Gonzalez / Sue Hart vs Tammie Bean / Leona Halama6-3, 6-3
W#4 DoublesCathy Dawson / Kathy Hodge vs Fonn Lee / Linda Sutton7-6, 6-4
2026-02-09vs High Point/Escutia-Gomez W3.5FWon 30
W#1 SinglesLeah Collins vs Nancy Horan4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDede Vehslage / Katherine Dreyer vs Alma Gomez / Beata Walenda0-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#4 DoublesSusan Hansen / Sue Hart vs Eve Liu / Gisella Kaendler6-4, 6-0
L#1 SinglesLauren Prager vs Thao Te3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesSue Hart / Allison Carlson vs Stacy Whitlow / Lisa Holdorf5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Gonzalez / Joy Pressly vs Pam Boronski / Erica Rosenwald1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#4 DoublesAmy Williams / Cathy Dawson vs Jacquelyn Lewis / Betty Preston3-6, 4-6
2026-02-05vs RGAC/Lucas W3.5FWon 10
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Gonzalez / Marlo Gooch vs Stephanie Smith / Dao Kelly7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesChristine Fimbres / Marlo Gooch vs Yuko Lowe / Lily Treacy6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAmy Williams / Dede Vehslage vs Liz Smart / Vanessa Rizzari3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#4 DoublesLeah Collins / Lauren Prager vs Leigh Powell / Tina Condit2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-01-09vs Stonebriar/Anderson-Buster W3.5FWon 21
W#1 DoublesSue Hart / Elizabeth Gonzalez vs Dina Patel / Kristi Barrientos6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesTami Jost / Michele Gurley vs Amy Baker / Nicole Graham2-6, 4-6
W#4 DoublesTonya Ball / Misty Westveld vs Stephanie Merkel / Melissa Boyd7-6, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings41 teams · W3.5F
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1The Nelson/Stoll W3.5F8033721252
2Royal Oaks/Copley W3.5F7027823248
3Fretz/Scott-Wood W3.5F7027823267
4Huffines/Howarth W3.5F7027823260
5The Lakes/Fain-Bingham W3.5F61241127284
6The Lakes/Akbany W3.5F61231232301
7Greenhill/Lipshy-Oujezdsky W3.5F62251536334
8Samuell Grand/Kilcullen-Shuff W3.5F52241123243
9Lakewood CC/Huffman-Satterwhite W3.5F52241130273
10Canyon Creek/Dawson W3.5F52231231302
11Lakes at Castle Hills/Lewis-Boronski W3.5F52221332299
12Jack Coleman/Hills-Hutchinson W3.5F52211432255
13Canyon Creek/Whitaker-Mathews W3.5F53241638350
14DCC/Filgo W3.5F53241642341
15DAC/Starnes-Stephanian W3.5F43241127281
16Stonebriar/Anderson-Buster W3.5F43201535308
17NTRC/Hedblom W3.5F43171839348
18Brookhaven/Frenkel-Smercina W3.5F43181740312
19Samuell Grand/Hilliard-Melson W3.5F43181743335
20High Point/Cavey W3.5F44221845353
21Northwood/Pask W3.5F34181739310
22Oak Creek/George-Chiou W3.5F34171840310
23Chandlers Landing/Waldron-Lee W3.5F34161942313
24High Point/Tucker-Itscovitch W3.5F34171842320
25Royal Oaks/Carter W3.5F34152043337
26Stonebridge Ranch/Giacchino-Cantu W3.5F34161944346
27Eldorado/Crockett-Miller W3.5F34152045347
28Jack Coleman/Nicholson-Carpenter W3.5F35182252386
29NTRC/Cole W3.5F35152554396
30McKinney/Johnson-Pavelka W3.5F25171839325
31RGAC/Lucas W3.5F25132247340
32DAC/Frazure-Sisk W3.5F25122348352
33Lakes at Castle Hills/Hooper-Cisneros W3.5F25122350354
34Fretz/Sherwood-Carpenter W3.5F26112964419
35Oak Creek/Kaplan-Grubstein W3.5F16142146333
36Oak Creek/Thornton-Hark W3.5F16122348338
37Wilkerson-Sanders/McKee-Powell W3.5F16112451360
38High Point/Escutia-Gomez W3.5F1682759379
39Lakewood CC/Cook-Adams W3.5F1653063410
40Springpark/Eubanks-Middlebrook W3.5F0733267418
41Gleneagles/Steyn-Priebe W3.5F0883267416

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Dawn Ritz
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.47
Laurin Shambora
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.45
Tami Jost
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Sue Hart
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.42
Katherine Dreyer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Dede Vehslage
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Marlo Gooch
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
April Moeser
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
Michele Gurley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.24
Christine Fimbres
usually #4 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Susan Hansen
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Joy Pressly
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.20
Leah Collins
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
3.18
Becky Henson
usually #4 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Lauren Prager
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
3.02
Cathy Dawson
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.02
Tonya Ball
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Misty Westveld
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laurin Shambora + Tami Jost6063% games+8.5% vs expected
Laurin Shambora + April Moeser101053% games−0.0% vs expected
Laurin Shambora + Christine Fimbres3449% games−14.3% vs expected
Marlo Gooch + Sue Hart8065% gamesnot enough data
Tami Jost + Leah Collins5070% gamesnot enough data
Michele Gurley + Marlo Gooch224 matchesnot enough data
Becky Henson + Joy Pressly314 matchesnot enough data
Dede Vehslage + Leah Collins213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dawn Ritz
42W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%29%71%
3.58
Laurin Shambora
34W–22L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.47
Tami Jost
33W–23L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.45
Sue Hart
26W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.43
Katherine Dreyer
4W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Dede Vehslage
14W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
3.35
Marlo Gooch
20W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%86%14%
3.35
3.5
April Moeser
17W–18L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.34
Michele Gurley
9W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Christine Fimbres
12W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
Susan Hansen
10W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.21
Joy Pressly
6W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
Leah Collins
14W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Becky Henson
5W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
Lauren Prager
7W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.17
3.5
Cathy Dawson
5W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.02
Tonya Ball
6W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
46%54%<1%
3.02
Misty Westveld
7W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
83%17%<1%
2.87

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.