Teams

Springpark/Eubanks-Middlebrook W3.5F

2026 DALLAS TENNIS 40 & Over ADULT W Friday · W3.5F

12 players · average NTRP 3.17 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-02-21vs Fretz/Scott-Wood W3.5FLost 05
L#1 DoublesJudi Robeson / Amy Pyrz vs Meredith Foster / Jamie Womack3-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesBecky Burns vs Marianna Clement0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJulie Richard / Karen Clemmons vs Susan Coy / Karen Rector4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSarah Southcott / Amy Northrop vs Rebecca Scott / Callie Nixon4-6, 4-6
L#4 DoublesKaren Eubanks / Susan Harvey vs Hilary Baker / Leanne Moore6-7, 2-6
2026-02-20vs McKinney/Johnson-Pavelka W3.5FLost 13
L#1 DoublesAmy Northrop / Karen Eubanks vs Tao Kang / Hong Zhang4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Clemmons / Susan Harvey vs Katie Johnson / Natalie Gilbert3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesBecky Burns / Julie Richard vs Laura Pavelka / Amy McCaulley4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#4 DoublesEllen Euting / Elisa Smith vs Lea Ellsworth / Cindy Graham1-6, 5-7
2026-02-13vs High Point/Tucker-Itscovitch W3.5FLost 04
L#1 DoublesJulie Richard / Karen Eubanks vs Deganit Gal / Celeste Schmidt0-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJudi Robeson / Susan Harvey vs Tricia Ehrisman / Dana Jones3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesEllen Euting / Karen Clemmons vs Mary Tucker / MARNI WISE - ITSCOVITCH2-6, 1-6
L#4 DoublesChin Su / Elisa Smith vs Kirsten Kirlin / Kelly Lilley1-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesAmy Pyrz / Susan Harvey vs Sloan Dix / Kate Walters1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesBecky Burns vs Mandy Stewart3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJulie Richard / Karen Clemmons vs Sara Straley / Allison Methvin0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSarah Southcott / Judi Robeson vs Bess Weeks / Sarah Patterson3-6, 2-6
L#4 DoublesKaren Eubanks / Elisa Smith vs Sarah Ringwald / Mindy Satterwhite4-6, 2-6
2026-02-06vs The Lakes/Akbany W3.5FLost 13
W#1 DoublesJulie Richard / Sarah Southcott vs Michelle Silver / Beth Ann Paone7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKaren Eubanks / Judi Robeson vs Chelsee Glasco / Erika Anderson4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Clemmons / Amy Pyrz vs Audrey Jarrin / Amanda Fritz2-6, 1-6
L#4 DoublesEllen Euting / Chin Su vs Cathy Turner / Susan Wu6-7, 2-6
2026-01-16vs Oak Creek/George-Chiou W3.5FLost 04
L#1 DoublesJudi Robeson / Karen Clemmons vs Milensky Rega / Rikki Wells5-7, 1-6
L#1 SinglesAmy Northrop vs Ghia Rossi3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAmy Pyrz / Ellen Euting vs Elizabeth George / Carrie Song3-6, 4-6
L#4 DoublesBecky Burns / Chin Su vs Lilian Bowari / Tomoko Tanabe2-6, 4-6
2026-01-09vs DAC/Frazure-Sisk W3.5FLost 13
W#1 DoublesBecky Burns / Sarah Southcott vs Rita Kessler / Lauren Lopez6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKaren Clemmons / Amy Northrop vs Laura Frazure / Sandy Debusk1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAmy Pyrz / Elisa Smith vs Molly Holley / Mary Hope Burns1-6, 4-6
L#4 DoublesChin Su / Ellen Euting vs Ashley Collins / Tara Versfelt3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings41 teams · W3.5F
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1The Nelson/Stoll W3.5F8033721252
2Royal Oaks/Copley W3.5F7027823248
3Fretz/Scott-Wood W3.5F7027823267
4Huffines/Howarth W3.5F7027823260
5The Lakes/Fain-Bingham W3.5F61241127284
6The Lakes/Akbany W3.5F61231232301
7Greenhill/Lipshy-Oujezdsky W3.5F62251536334
8Samuell Grand/Kilcullen-Shuff W3.5F52241123243
9Lakewood CC/Huffman-Satterwhite W3.5F52241130273
10Canyon Creek/Dawson W3.5F52231231302
11Lakes at Castle Hills/Lewis-Boronski W3.5F52221332299
12Jack Coleman/Hills-Hutchinson W3.5F52211432255
13Canyon Creek/Whitaker-Mathews W3.5F53241638350
14DCC/Filgo W3.5F53241642341
15DAC/Starnes-Stephanian W3.5F43241127281
16Stonebriar/Anderson-Buster W3.5F43201535308
17NTRC/Hedblom W3.5F43171839348
18Brookhaven/Frenkel-Smercina W3.5F43181740312
19Samuell Grand/Hilliard-Melson W3.5F43181743335
20High Point/Cavey W3.5F44221845353
21Northwood/Pask W3.5F34181739310
22Oak Creek/George-Chiou W3.5F34171840310
23Chandlers Landing/Waldron-Lee W3.5F34161942313
24High Point/Tucker-Itscovitch W3.5F34171842320
25Royal Oaks/Carter W3.5F34152043337
26Stonebridge Ranch/Giacchino-Cantu W3.5F34161944346
27Eldorado/Crockett-Miller W3.5F34152045347
28Jack Coleman/Nicholson-Carpenter W3.5F35182252386
29NTRC/Cole W3.5F35152554396
30McKinney/Johnson-Pavelka W3.5F25171839325
31RGAC/Lucas W3.5F25132247340
32DAC/Frazure-Sisk W3.5F25122348352
33Lakes at Castle Hills/Hooper-Cisneros W3.5F25122350354
34Fretz/Sherwood-Carpenter W3.5F26112964419
35Oak Creek/Kaplan-Grubstein W3.5F16142146333
36Oak Creek/Thornton-Hark W3.5F16122348338
37Wilkerson-Sanders/McKee-Powell W3.5F16112451360
38High Point/Escutia-Gomez W3.5F1682759379
39Lakewood CC/Cook-Adams W3.5F1653063410
40Springpark/Eubanks-Middlebrook W3.5F0733267418
41Gleneagles/Steyn-Priebe W3.5F0883267416

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Judi Robeson
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.22
Julie Richard
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.21
Sarah Southcott
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published
3.11
Amy Pyrz
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.08
Karen Eubanks
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #4 Doubles 40% · published
3.00
Amy Northrop
usually #1 Doubles 25%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.97
Karen Clemmons
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
2.92
Becky Burns
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.92
Ellen Euting
usually #4 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.68
Elisa Smith
usually #4 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.62
Chin Su
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 3
Loretta Middlebrook
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Clemmons + Julie Richard1538% games−6.2% vs expected
Karen Clemmons + Amy Northrop314 matchesnot enough data
Sarah Southcott + Becky Burns314 matchesnot enough data
Karen Eubanks + Julie Richard123 matchesnot enough data
Karen Eubanks + Amy Northrop213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Judi Robeson
36W–45L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.30
Julie Richard
10W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.22
Sarah Southcott
26W–32L career · 8 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Amy Pyrz
0W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.11
Karen Eubanks
6W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.08
3
Amy Northrop
13W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.00
Karen Clemmons
13W–33L career · 7 lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
2.97
3
Becky Burns
16W–17L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
2.92
3.5
Ellen Euting
11W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
74%26%<1%
2.92
3
Elisa Smith
1W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
2.68
3
Chin Su
10W–19L career · 5 lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
2.62
Loretta Middlebrook
1W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.