Teams

High Point/Escutia-Gomez W3.5F

2026 DALLAS TENNIS 40 & Over ADULT W Friday · W3.5F

18 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#1 DoublesJadey Liu / Beata Walenda vs Tina Condit / Lily Treacy6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesNancy Horan vs Leigh Powell6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJeannette Escutia / Phyllis McGahey vs Yuko Lowe / Hsiao-Lan Wilson3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesPaige Bower / Allison Sullivan vs Sandy Beysselance / Heidi McKee1-6, 3-6
L#4 DoublesJeanine Michna-Bales / Gisella Kaendler vs Dawn Covin / Kathleen Nuytten7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2026-02-13vs Stonebriar/Anderson-Buster W3.5FLost 05
L#1 DoublesJeanette Johnson / Beata Walenda vs Dina Patel / Joanie Buster1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesWenLing Chiu vs Lisa Oldham2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesPaige Bower / Phyllis McGahey vs Melissa Boyd / Kristi Barrientos4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMelissa Monroe / Michelle Sowards vs Donna Bickerstaff / Katherine Barsch3-6, 4-6
L#4 DoublesAllison Sullivan / Jo Alamares vs Michelle Reynolds / Kim Lee4-6, 6-7
2026-02-09vs Canyon Creek/Dawson W3.5FLost 05
L#1 DoublesPaige Bower / Laura Schussler vs Dawn Ritz / Allison Carlson4-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesNancy Horan vs Leah Collins6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJeannette Escutia / Phyllis McGahey vs Laurin Shambora / April Moeser3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAlma Gomez / Beata Walenda vs Dede Vehslage / Katherine Dreyer6-0, 3-6, 0-1
L#4 DoublesEve Liu / Gisella Kaendler vs Susan Hansen / Sue Hart4-6, 0-6
2026-02-06vs Royal Oaks/Copley W3.5FLost 14
L#1 DoublesPhyllis McGahey / Jadey Liu vs Kelly Turco / Julie Gasch1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesNancy Horan vs Emily Cox6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLaura Schussler / Paige Bower vs Fran Matise / Kerri Scott2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAllison Sullivan / Laura Randoll vs Amber Carter / Melissa Peticolas1-6, 4-6
L#4 DoublesGayle Giles / Jeanine Michna-Bales vs Lindsay Mayer / Liza Schlitt4-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesPaige Bower / Laura Schussler vs Betty Preston / Holly Merritt5-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesNancy Horan vs Kalee Pair6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesBeata Walenda / Jeanette Johnson vs Dana Maksimovich / Jacquelyn Lewis2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesGayle Giles / Allison Sullivan vs Pam Boronski / Thao Te0-6, 3-6
L#4 DoublesMelissa Monroe / Michelle Sowards vs Allison Ludwig / Angela McCarthy5-7, 1-6
L#1 DoublesAlma Gomez / Jadey Liu vs Fonn Lee / Courtney Bradshaw4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesNancy Horan vs Callie Neatherlin6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPaige Bower / Laura Schussler vs Tammie Bean / Leona Halama6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMelissa Monroe / Beata Walenda vs Laya Gan / Shana Young1-6, 4-6
W#4 DoublesJo Alamares / Michelle Sowards vs Ashli Hall / Gina Hancock3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-01-09vs RGAC/Lucas W3.5FLost 14
L#1 DoublesGayle Giles / Jeanine Michna-Bales vs Dao Kelly / Hayley Hill3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesEve Liu vs Tari Kinsey1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJeannette Escutia / Phyllis McGahey vs Julie Asbill / Stephanie Smith4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAllison Sullivan / Gisella Kaendler vs Amy Clark / Katie Kirk6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#4 DoublesAlma Gomez / WenLing Chiu vs Mindy Lucas / Elaine Kelley2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings41 teams · W3.5F
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1The Nelson/Stoll W3.5F8033721252
2Royal Oaks/Copley W3.5F7027823248
3Fretz/Scott-Wood W3.5F7027823267
4Huffines/Howarth W3.5F7027823260
5The Lakes/Fain-Bingham W3.5F61241127284
6The Lakes/Akbany W3.5F61231232301
7Greenhill/Lipshy-Oujezdsky W3.5F62251536334
8Samuell Grand/Kilcullen-Shuff W3.5F52241123243
9Lakewood CC/Huffman-Satterwhite W3.5F52241130273
10Canyon Creek/Dawson W3.5F52231231302
11Lakes at Castle Hills/Lewis-Boronski W3.5F52221332299
12Jack Coleman/Hills-Hutchinson W3.5F52211432255
13Canyon Creek/Whitaker-Mathews W3.5F53241638350
14DCC/Filgo W3.5F53241642341
15DAC/Starnes-Stephanian W3.5F43241127281
16Stonebriar/Anderson-Buster W3.5F43201535308
17NTRC/Hedblom W3.5F43171839348
18Brookhaven/Frenkel-Smercina W3.5F43181740312
19Samuell Grand/Hilliard-Melson W3.5F43181743335
20High Point/Cavey W3.5F44221845353
21Northwood/Pask W3.5F34181739310
22Oak Creek/George-Chiou W3.5F34171840310
23Chandlers Landing/Waldron-Lee W3.5F34161942313
24High Point/Tucker-Itscovitch W3.5F34171842320
25Royal Oaks/Carter W3.5F34152043337
26Stonebridge Ranch/Giacchino-Cantu W3.5F34161944346
27Eldorado/Crockett-Miller W3.5F34152045347
28Jack Coleman/Nicholson-Carpenter W3.5F35182252386
29NTRC/Cole W3.5F35152554396
30McKinney/Johnson-Pavelka W3.5F25171839325
31RGAC/Lucas W3.5F25132247340
32DAC/Frazure-Sisk W3.5F25122348352
33Lakes at Castle Hills/Hooper-Cisneros W3.5F25122350354
34Fretz/Sherwood-Carpenter W3.5F26112964419
35Oak Creek/Kaplan-Grubstein W3.5F16142146333
36Oak Creek/Thornton-Hark W3.5F16122348338
37Wilkerson-Sanders/McKee-Powell W3.5F16112451360
38High Point/Escutia-Gomez W3.5F1682759379
39Lakewood CC/Cook-Adams W3.5F1653063410
40Springpark/Eubanks-Middlebrook W3.5F0733267418
41Gleneagles/Steyn-Priebe W3.5F0883267416

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Nancy Horan
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.29
Jadey Liu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.24
Beata Walenda
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.22
Laura Schussler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.20
Gisella Kaendler
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.16
Jo Alamares
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Phyllis McGahey
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.13
Paige Bower
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.06
Alma Gomez
usually #4 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.04
WenLing Chiu
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.03
Melissa Monroe
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
2.99
Jeannette Escutia
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Jeanine Michna-Bales
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.90
Eve Liu
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
2.89
Michelle Sowards
usually #4 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
2.88
Gayle Giles
usually #4 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.83
Laura Randoll
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jeanette Johnson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paige Bower + Laura Schussler3343% games−6.1% vs expected
Melissa Monroe + Michelle Sowards1434% games−10.3% vs expected
Phyllis McGahey + Jeannette Escutia1437% gamesnot enough data
Gisella Kaendler + Jeanine Michna-Bales044 matchesnot enough data
Alma Gomez + Phyllis McGahey123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nancy Horan
30W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%80%19%
3.38
Jadey Liu
13W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Beata Walenda
9W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
Laura Schussler
10W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
Gisella Kaendler
16W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
Jo Alamares
12W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.16
Phyllis McGahey
3W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
3.14
Paige Bower
6W–15L career · 6 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Alma Gomez
8W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.06
WenLing Chiu
2W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
3.04
Melissa Monroe
7W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
3.03
Jeannette Escutia
4W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
2.99
Jeanine Michna-Bales
9W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
2.97
Eve Liu
2W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
76%24%<1%
2.90
Michelle Sowards
30W–31L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.89
Gayle Giles
1W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
81%19%<1%
2.88
Laura Randoll
8W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
89%11%<1%
2.83
Jeanette Johnson
26W–42L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.