Teams

Oak Creek/George-Chiou W3.5F

2026 DALLAS TENNIS 40 & Over ADULT W Friday · W3.5F

13 players · average NTRP 3.33 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-02-20vs DAC/Frazure-Sisk W3.5FWon 31
W#1 DoublesElizabeth George / Milensky Rega vs Rita Kessler / Amy Timmerman3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNicole Roshto / Ami McCann vs Sandy Debusk / Carol Barrows4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesCarrie Song / Taylor Klepsch vs Mary Sisk / Molly Holley6-2, 6-4
W#4 DoublesGhia Rossi / Tomoko Tanabe vs Morgan Farrow / Laura Frazure6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2026-02-13vs Fretz/Scott-Wood W3.5FLost 12
L#1 DoublesElizabeth George / Milensky Rega vs Angie Wood / Rebecca Scott2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAmi McCann / Omara Al-Hafi vs Susan Coy / Callie Nixon3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesRikki Wells / Carrie Song vs Ginger Twichell / Jamie Womack6-3, 6-1
L#1 DoublesMilensky Rega / Rikki Wells vs Sloan Dix / Kate Walters5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesCindy Chiou vs Alex Fergus1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth George / Tomoko Tanabe vs Stephanie Burgard / Whitney Huffman6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCarrie Song / Nicole Roshto vs Lindsey Diaz / Mindy Satterwhite3-6, 4-6
W#4 DoublesTaylor Klepsch / Emily Simon vs Jill Newman / Stacey Williams6-3, 6-0
2026-02-06vs McKinney/Johnson-Pavelka W3.5FLost 14
L#1 DoublesOmara Al-Hafi / Milensky Rega vs Becky Connet / Natalie Gilbert3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesCarrie Song vs Hong Zhang3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesNicole Roshto / Tomoko Tanabe vs Megan Keathley / Cindy Graham6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesElizabeth George / Emily Simon vs Kassandra Fish / Shanna Claytor4-6, 3-6
L#4 DoublesCindy Chiou / Lilian Bowari vs Amy Russo / Jody Schueler4-6, 6-7
W#1 DoublesOmara Al-Hafi / Tomoko Tanabe vs Dana Jones / Celeste Schmidt6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesCindy Chiou vs Tara Glotzbach6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesElizabeth George / Milensky Rega vs Tricia Ehrisman / Kirsten Kirlin6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesMilensky Rega / Rikki Wells vs Judi Robeson / Karen Clemmons7-5, 6-1
W#1 SinglesGhia Rossi vs Amy Northrop6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAmi McCann / Taylor Klepsch vs Sarah Southcott / Susan Harvey7-5, 7-6
W#3 DoublesElizabeth George / Carrie Song vs Amy Pyrz / Ellen Euting6-3, 6-4
W#4 DoublesLilian Bowari / Tomoko Tanabe vs Becky Burns / Chin Su6-2, 6-4
2026-01-09vs The Lakes/Akbany W3.5FLost 13
W#1 DoublesAmi McCann / Tomoko Tanabe vs Tracy Akbany / Michelle Silver3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesCindy Chiou vs Kristi Flanagan3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth George / Milensky Rega vs Jennifer Byrne / Audrey Jarrin3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesEmily Simon / Carrie Song vs Debi Meuret / Amanda Fritz4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings41 teams · W3.5F
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1The Nelson/Stoll W3.5F8033721252
2Royal Oaks/Copley W3.5F7027823248
3Fretz/Scott-Wood W3.5F7027823267
4Huffines/Howarth W3.5F7027823260
5The Lakes/Fain-Bingham W3.5F61241127284
6The Lakes/Akbany W3.5F61231232301
7Greenhill/Lipshy-Oujezdsky W3.5F62251536334
8Samuell Grand/Kilcullen-Shuff W3.5F52241123243
9Lakewood CC/Huffman-Satterwhite W3.5F52241130273
10Canyon Creek/Dawson W3.5F52231231302
11Lakes at Castle Hills/Lewis-Boronski W3.5F52221332299
12Jack Coleman/Hills-Hutchinson W3.5F52211432255
13Canyon Creek/Whitaker-Mathews W3.5F53241638350
14DCC/Filgo W3.5F53241642341
15DAC/Starnes-Stephanian W3.5F43241127281
16Stonebriar/Anderson-Buster W3.5F43201535308
17NTRC/Hedblom W3.5F43171839348
18Brookhaven/Frenkel-Smercina W3.5F43181740312
19Samuell Grand/Hilliard-Melson W3.5F43181743335
20High Point/Cavey W3.5F44221845353
21Northwood/Pask W3.5F34181739310
22Oak Creek/George-Chiou W3.5F34171840310
23Chandlers Landing/Waldron-Lee W3.5F34161942313
24High Point/Tucker-Itscovitch W3.5F34171842320
25Royal Oaks/Carter W3.5F34152043337
26Stonebridge Ranch/Giacchino-Cantu W3.5F34161944346
27Eldorado/Crockett-Miller W3.5F34152045347
28Jack Coleman/Nicholson-Carpenter W3.5F35182252386
29NTRC/Cole W3.5F35152554396
30McKinney/Johnson-Pavelka W3.5F25171839325
31RGAC/Lucas W3.5F25132247340
32DAC/Frazure-Sisk W3.5F25122348352
33Lakes at Castle Hills/Hooper-Cisneros W3.5F25122350354
34Fretz/Sherwood-Carpenter W3.5F26112964419
35Oak Creek/Kaplan-Grubstein W3.5F16142146333
36Oak Creek/Thornton-Hark W3.5F16122348338
37Wilkerson-Sanders/McKee-Powell W3.5F16112451360
38High Point/Escutia-Gomez W3.5F1682759379
39Lakewood CC/Cook-Adams W3.5F1653063410
40Springpark/Eubanks-Middlebrook W3.5F0733267418
41Gleneagles/Steyn-Priebe W3.5F0883267416

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Rikki Wells
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.39
Tomoko Tanabe
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
3.29
Ghia Rossi
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.25
Omara Al-Hafi
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.24
Nicole Roshto
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.23
Milensky Rega
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.19
Cindy Chiou
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.13
Taylor Klepsch
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 20% · published
3.11
Emily Simon
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
3.04
Ami McCann
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.94
Krystle Johnston
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published
2.93
Carrie Song
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 3
2.86
Lilian Bowari
usually #4 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Taylor Klepsch + Nicole Roshto5170% games+16.6% vs expected
Milensky Rega + Rikki Wells4260% games+15.1% vs expected
Ami McCann + Omara Al-Hafi3641% games−3.1% vs expected
Ami McCann + Tomoko Tanabe3250% gamesnot enough data
Tomoko Tanabe + Nicole Roshto4162% gamesnot enough data
Carrie Song + Emily Simon033 matchesnot enough data
Lilian Bowari + Tomoko Tanabe213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rikki Wells
7W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
3.48
Tomoko Tanabe
15W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%77%22%
3.39
Ghia Rossi
13W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
Omara Al-Hafi
6W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Nicole Roshto
32W–7L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%4%96%
3.24
Milensky Rega
12W–13L career · 7 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Cindy Chiou
5W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
Taylor Klepsch
26W–9L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%17%83%
3.13
Emily Simon
1W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.11
3.5
Ami McCann
12W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
3.04
Krystle Johnston
5W–3L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
Carrie Song
9W–19L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.93
Lilian Bowari
4W–15L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
2.86

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.