Teams

EDG-Bobcats 3.5 40+ Keller

2022 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.45 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-03-05vs ETC-TopSpinners-Ajoy 3.5MWon 31
W#1 DoublesJack Young / David To vs Ethan Chung / SHREERAJ SUTARIA6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesOwen Chang vs SasiKumar Natesan6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesRanjit Prabhu / Paul Cho vs Amit Mahajan / Jonathan Brown1-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesYuan Wang / Xianglong Huang vs Gaurav Kanade / Hilario Koyama7-6, 6-2
2022-02-27vs WSC-Full Metal Rackets-HummerSplit 22
L#1 DoublesPaul Cho / Xianglong Huang vs Peter Sefton / Vijay Sankaran5-7, 0-6
L#1 SinglesOwen Chang vs Frank Liu6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPaul Keller / Lance Wilken vs Jonathan Hummer / John Monahan6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJack Young / Michael Cung vs Steven Bishop / Raleigh Wilson6-0, 6-4
2022-02-25vs CP-WescottLost 12
L#1 DoublesOwen Chang / Xianglong Huang vs Joe Morrow / Rich Choi6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesPaul Keller / Lance Wilken vs Chandra Srinivasan / Atsushi Yoshida6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMichael Cung / Yuan Wang vs Kaushik Purohit / John Donati6-2, 5-7, 0-1
2022-02-12vs MC-Mens 3.5 Bluesmen-NgoSplit 22
W#1 DoublesOwen Chang / Bradford Gliner vs Huy Ngo / Seth Zeichner6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesRanjit Prabhu vs Dimitris Voutsas5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesXianglong Huang / Kirk Ketefian vs Adrian Robles / Jay Wellan3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPaul Cho / Yuan Wang vs Matthew Rust / Craig McKernan3-6, 0-6
2022-02-06vs MI-Chen/PaeSplit 22
L#1 DoublesBradford Gliner / Kirk Ketefian vs Max Saelzer / Jim Holland5-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesOwen Chang vs Jeff Comstock6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPaul Cho / Xianglong Huang vs Steven DeGracia / Gulliver Swenson2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesRanjit Prabhu / Yuan Wang vs Shawn Preston / Virl Hill6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2022-01-30vs RBW-CoeSplit 22
L#1 DoublesDavid To / Kirk Ketefian vs Heng Liu / Jeff Wilson4-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesOwen Chang vs Bill Dow7-6, 5-3
L#2 DoublesPaul Cho / Yuan Wang vs Chris Moore / Timothy Kniffin6-0, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJack Young / Michael Cung vs Bret Arsenault / Norman Cheuk5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2022-01-21vs TCSP-KothaLost 04
L#1 DoublesDavid To / Nick Cravalho vs Matthew Metz / Douglas Pearson3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesXianglong Huang vs Arun Sundaram6-1, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLance Wilken / Paul Keller vs Kevin McNulty / Lee Schindler4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMichael Cung / Paul Cho vs Scott Curtis / Gabe Licka4-6, 2-6
2022-01-15vs BETC-Wu 3.5MWon 31
W#1 DoublesDavid To / Xianglong Huang vs John Hughes / Bruce Colley6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesRanjit Prabhu vs Roy Higashi6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesPaul Keller / Lance Wilken vs Rich Mursch / Robert Brakke6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPaul Cho / Jack Young vs Jeffrey McBroom / Greg Goodwin3-6, 3-6
2022-01-09vs BC-3.5 Camara 40+Lost 04
L#1 DoublesNick Cravalho / David To vs Juan Vegarra / Joe Bilsborough1-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesXianglong Huang vs Michael LaMoria5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesPaul Keller / Lance Wilken vs Alex Camara / Matthew Scher5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRanjit Prabhu / Jack Young vs Tom Clemente / Duff Bryant2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings35 teams · 3.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1RBW-Coe81261024283
2TCSP-Kotha81251128263
3CAC/SL-Wanat 3.5M7126617216
4MC-Red Hawks-Vashist7124821237
5MI-Wannabe's-Mattox7125725250
6AYTC-High Lobbers-Stoneberg72251126294
7TCSP-Sandbaggers-Kelley72231330269
8CP-Graves72251133299
9PL-Toki Highballers-Escalona6224823218
10WSC-Team Lash 3.5M62221030271
11BC-3.5 Camara 40+63261026285
12MI-Chen/Pae63261028265
13HBSQ-Poletti53211127270
14FC-General Mon Calpe53131941317
15STC-Skrobut54181840322
16STC-Pirates-Ashcraft44201226259
17ETC-Bursiek44131941289
18PL-Douglas45211535338
19EDG-Dickson45221438331
20PSC-Avengers-Kancherla45181839339
21CAC/SL-Recoil Reboot-Hanson45152148362
22CP-Wescott45152148351
23EDG-Bobcats 3.5 40+ Keller45152150357
24RBW-Avengers40-Ravi35161636308
25WSC-Iyer 3.5M35151738284
26PSC-Dacia-Frintu35102247328
27BETC-Wu 3.5M36132348353
28MC-Mens 3.5 Bluesmen-Ngo36122451365
29RTC-Roger that-Aggarwal26112146316
30CP-Gamma Squeeze-Viriththamulla26112146323
31NTC-String Theory-Burns2692348345
32ETC-TopSpinners-Ajoy 3.5M27112555371
33MI-Li17112145331
34BC-Sekins/Manning 40-3.50823060367
35WSC-2022-40+ Tennis is fun-Karmali0933368420

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Owen Chang
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.32
David To
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.31
Michael Cung
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Paul Cho
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.25
Kirk Ketefian
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Lance Wilken
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Bradford Gliner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Yuan Wang
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.12
Ranjit Prabhu
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.04
Jack Young
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.00
Paul Keller
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.90
Xianglong Huang
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Yuan Wang + Michael Cung5462% games+10.5% vs expected
Bradford Gliner + Kirk Ketefian10558% games+8.0% vs expected
David To + Paul Cho17458% games+5.7% vs expected
Yuan Wang + Paul Cho5552% games+3.9% vs expected
Bradford Gliner + Paul Cho7464% games−0.9% vs expected
Paul Cho + Michael Cung3550% games−1.6% vs expected
Lance Wilken + Paul Keller161652% games−1.7% vs expected
Paul Cho + Ranjit Prabhu2547% games−1.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Owen Chang
61W–52L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
3.43
3.5
David To
94W–78L career · 8 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Michael Cung
78W–49L career · 9 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Paul Cho
100W–72L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Kirk Ketefian
44W–33L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Lance Wilken
44W–49L career · 5 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Bradford Gliner
95W–93L career · 2 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Yuan Wang
113W–79L career · 9 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Ranjit Prabhu
28W–29L career · 5 lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.12
3.5
Jack Young
62W–96L career · 5 lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
3.04
3.5
Paul Keller
30W–51L career · type A · 5 lines in 2022
49%51%<1%
3.00
3
Xianglong Huang
51W–80L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
2.90

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.