Teams

SPANISH TRAIL #1

2023 USTA ADULT LEAGUE 55 & OVER · 7.0 WOMEN- 55 & OVER

13 players · average NTRP 3.12 / NEVADA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-05-25vs WHITNEY MESA PARK #1Lost 02
L#1 DoublesPamela Rusk / Aida Shirley vs Clairen Peeters / Kelly McPherson1-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesPeggy Latour / Karolyn Willoughby vs Lana Penrose / Diane Schopp2-6, 2-6
2023-05-18vs SPANISH TRAIL #2Split 11
L#1 DoublesLyudmila Kotseva / Pamela Rusk vs Deborah Davis / Lena Grotz5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesPeggy Latour / Marie Ramsey vs Kathie Dye / Angela Zobrist6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2023-05-11vs SUN CITY SUMMERLINLost 02
L#1 DoublesDorothy Urban / Lyudmila Kotseva vs Judith Kraus / Barbara Randell5-5
L#2 DoublesPamela Rusk / Aida Shirley vs Patricia Hawkins / Doreen Lono3-6, 4-6
2023-05-04vs RED ROCK CCWon 20
W#1 DoublesPamela Rusk / Lyudmila Kotseva vs Terri Andrews / Patti Oakes6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPeggy Latour / Karolyn Willoughby vs Janae Runyon / Helen McDaniel4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-04-27vs WHITNEY MESA PARK #2Lost 01
L#1 DoublesPamela Rusk / Aida Shirley vs Patricia Delgado / Dixie Stephens3-6, 6-0, 0-1
2023-04-20vs TPCLost 02
L#1 DoublesPamela Rusk / Aida Shirley vs Sheri Feast / Michelle Beckwith2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMarisa Ptak / Lyudmila Kotseva vs Nilda Chang / Liwei Li3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2023-04-13vs DRAGONRIDGE CCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesPamela Rusk / Lyudmila Kotseva vs Kristi Crawford / Brenda Rowles6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMarie Ramsey / Sheila Stetts vs Kayleen Krahenbuhl / Cindi Ray6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2023-03-30vs NV/WALBRIDGE/ADULT55&OVER/W7.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesDebra Horns / Pamela Rusk vs Robin Wogalter / Joann Komanowski6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMarie Ramsey / Sheila Stetts vs Liisa Walbridge / Patty Yamano2-6, 3-6
2023-03-23vs SUMMERLIN ARBORSLost 02
L#1 DoublesDebra Horns / Pamela Rusk vs Diane Paull / Valeria Perdomo6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLyudmila Kotseva / Marie Ramsey vs Arlene Babbitt / Roxane Kazarian3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 WOMEN- 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Lyudmila Kotseva
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.09
Debra Horns
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Pamela Rusk
usually #1 Doubles 89%, also #2 Doubles 11% · published 3.5
2.98
Marie Ramsey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.80
Marisa Ptak
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 3
Patricia Boudier
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 3
2.71
Sheila Stetts
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.70
Karolyn Willoughby
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.67
Peggy Latour
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.61
Deborah Graham
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.60
Dorothy Urban
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.59
Aida Shirley
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.57
Jane Casovan
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lyudmila Kotseva + Pamela Rusk3347% games+8.7% vs expected
Patricia Boudier + Marisa Ptak141253% games+5.5% vs expected
Lyudmila Kotseva + Marisa Ptak2644% games+4.3% vs expected
Debra Horns + Lyudmila Kotseva3445% games+3.3% vs expected
Marie Ramsey + Marisa Ptak431259% games+2.4% vs expected
Dorothy Urban + Patricia Boudier91048% games+2.3% vs expected
Aida Shirley + Pamela Rusk91847% games+1.8% vs expected
Jane Casovan + Marisa Ptak21043% games+0.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Lyudmila Kotseva
41W–83L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Debra Horns
40W–72L career · 2 lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.09
3.5
Pamela Rusk
77W–134L career · 9 lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.06
3
Marie Ramsey
87W–120L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
Marisa Ptak
86W–92L career · 9 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Patricia Boudier
29W–55L career · 11 lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Sheila Stetts
100W–207L career · 12 lines in 2023
5%94%1%
2.71
3
Karolyn Willoughby
25W–43L career · 2 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Peggy Latour
71W–119L career · 9 lines in 2023
10%90%1%
2.67
3
Deborah Graham
56W–153L career · 7 lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
2.61
3
Dorothy Urban
34W–57L career · 3 lines in 2023
21%78%<1%
2.60
3
Aida Shirley
131W–161L career · 4 lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
2.59
3
Jane Casovan
124W–184L career · 12 lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
2.57

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.