Teams

Liberty Park Tennis-Berg/Hronek

2022 USTA Adult 40 & Over · 4.0W PM

16 players · average NTRP 4.05 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-07-26vs Cottonwood Club-WarrenLost 01
L#2 DoublesMiglena Aaron / Mandy Berg vs Lori Briesacher / Janelle Pulley0-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-07-19vs Park City MARC-Greenhalgh/BrooksWon 10
W#2 DoublesLynn Russo / Miglena Aaron vs Stephanie Clark / Renae Brooks6-3, 6-2
2022-07-12vs Sunpro-Blackhurst/MayberryWon 10
W#2 DoublesMiglena Aaron / Mandy Berg vs Karen Christensen / Shelli Johnston6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-06-28Won 10
W#2 DoublesMiglena Aaron / Mandy Berg vs Laura Johnston / Amy Hansen6-2, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 4.0W PM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Liberty Park Tennis-Berg/Hronek35141839293

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Rosa McGuire
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
4.20
Jessica Schulz
usually #1 Singles 36%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published
3.88
Mandy Berg
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 18% · published 4
3.84
Rachel Labrum
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.83
Crystel Fox
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
Ann Hronek
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.72
Kalee King
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.68
Melissa Despain
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.66
Lynn Russo
usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #3 Doubles 23% · published
3.56
Angie Neuberger
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.54
Berit Campion
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.54
Miglena Aaron
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.53
Nicole Mills
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.50
Cassandra Suite-Smith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.10
Katri Koehle
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Maggie McCann
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lynn Russo + Rosa McGuire5256% games+11.8% vs expected
Mandy Berg + Katri Koehle2349% games+11.8% vs expected
Kalee King + Mandy Berg7462% games+8.3% vs expected
Nicole Mills + Rosa McGuire22763% games+8.2% vs expected
Mandy Berg + Rosa McGuire301162% games+3.6% vs expected
Lynn Russo + Melissa Despain2444% games+3.4% vs expected
Nicole Mills + Katri Koehle9560% games+2.9% vs expected
Ann Hronek + Rosa McGuire3254% games+1.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Rosa McGuire
155W–42L career · 6 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
4.21
Jessica Schulz
126W–50L career · 11 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
4.20
4
Mandy Berg
176W–112L career · 11 lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.88
4
Rachel Labrum
94W–61L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
3.84
4
Crystel Fox
151W–135L career · 8 lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Ann Hronek
65W–44L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Kalee King
117W–93L career · 7 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Melissa Despain
174W–109L career · 8 lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.68
Lynn Russo
139W–124L career · 13 lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.66
4
Angie Neuberger
73W–76L career · 3 lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
3.56
4
Berit Campion
104W–139L career · 6 lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
3.54
Miglena Aaron
39W–51L career · 4 lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
3.54
Nicole Mills
88W–75L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%41%59%
3.53
4
Cassandra Suite-Smith
43W–54L career · 1 line in 2022
50%50%<1%
3.50
Katri Koehle
84W–81L career · 6 lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.10
Maggie McCann
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.