Teams

Wimberly/70/3.0/W/LA

70 & Over Adut Multi State Invitaitonal - WOMEN · 3.0 (70&O) WOMEN

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-03-21vs CULVER/70/3.0/W/OKLost 12
W#1 DoublesMadeline Cummer / Cynthia Payne vs Bonnie Bell / Bonnie Canfield6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesReeda Taylor / Susan McFarlain vs Vivienne Culver / Sue Zeng4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTheresa Champagne / Ann Wimberly vs Clare Ashby Carpenter / Gayle Johnson1-6, 4-6
2026-03-21vs Peterson/70/3.0/W/TXWon 30
W#1 DoublesMadeline Cummer / Cynthia Payne vs Amelia Maxwell / Phyllis Jolley Smith6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesConnie Holoman / Laretta Barrow vs Dorothy Peterson / Melinda Ross6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesFrances Pitman / Frances Flores-Odom vs Debra Washmon / Suzanne Middleton6-2, 6-3
2026-03-20vs Summers/70/3.0/W/MSWon 21
L#1 DoublesReeda Taylor / Susan McFarlain vs Mary Felder / Rosemary Rushing6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLaretta Barrow / Connie Holoman vs Peggy Polk / Yvette Lott6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesFrances Pitman / Frances Flores-Odom vs Sondra Broussard / Llewellyn Coon6-1, 6-4
2026-03-20vs Alleman/70/3.0/W/LAWon 21
W#1 DoublesCynthia Payne / Madeline Cummer vs Philippa Mueller / Marilyn Emfinger6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesGloria Smith / Theresa Champagne vs Anita Leggett / Cathy Moore3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAnn Swearingen / Sandra Williamson vs Vickey Alleman / Anna Stutes6-4, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · 3.0 (70&O) WOMEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1McCotter/70/3.0/W/LA40102789
2Broglio/70/3.0/W/LA401028107
3Vernor/70/3.0/W/TX31102675
4Wimberly/70/3.0/W/LA31841099
5Cochran/70/3.0/W/LA319311101
6Peterson/70/3.0/W/TX226613101
7Summers/70/3.0/W/MS225715116
8CULVER/70/3.0/W/OK135715109
9Delaney/70/3.0/W/LA134816125
10Childress/70/3.0/W/MS1321021129
11Alleman/70/3.0/W/LA0421021132
12Finton/70/3.0/W/AR0411122134

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Cynthia Payne
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.89
Connie Holoman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.80
Reeda Taylor
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.80
Frances Flores-Odom
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.76
Madeline Cummer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Ann Wimberly
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.66
Theresa Champagne
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.66
Frances Pitman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.59
Susan McFarlain
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.59
Sandra Williamson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.58
Gloria Smith
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.55
Ann Swearingen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.47
Laretta Barrow
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Madeline Cummer + Cynthia Payne7265% games+3.1% vs expected
Madeline Cummer + Frances Pitman224 matchesnot enough data
Frances Flores-Odom + Frances Pitman404 matchesnot enough data
Theresa Champagne + Gloria Smith213 matchesnot enough data
Theresa Champagne + Connie Holoman123 matchesnot enough data
Sandra Williamson + Laretta Barrow033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Cynthia Payne
12W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%33%67%
3.06
3
Connie Holoman
7W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%80%19%
2.89
Reeda Taylor
12W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Frances Flores-Odom
8W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.80
Madeline Cummer
56W–48L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%95%3%
2.76
3
Ann Wimberly
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Theresa Champagne
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%89%<1%
2.66
3
Frances Pitman
17W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%88%<1%
2.66
Susan McFarlain
4W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
23%76%<1%
2.59
Sandra Williamson
4W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
25%75%<1%
2.59
3
Gloria Smith
9W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
28%72%<1%
2.58
3
Ann Swearingen
10W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
35%65%<1%
2.55
Laretta Barrow
9W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
59%41%<1%
2.47

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.