Teams

Finton/70/3.0/W/AR

70 & Over Adut Multi State Invitaitonal - WOMEN · 3.0 (70&O) WOMEN

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-03-21vs Cochran/70/3.0/W/LALost 03
L#1 DoublesElaine Clayton / Rosemary Farrell vs Shirley Martin / Bonnie Cox3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJoanne Chambers / Paula Duncan vs Pam Haley / Marlene Fontenot1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesHelen Baggett / Alice Finton vs Terry Shinn / Sharon Boyd0-6, 1-6
2026-03-21vs Childress/70/3.0/W/MSLost 12
W#1 DoublesElaine Clayton / Rosemary Farrell vs Ann McGee / Debbie Boykin6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesVicky Hunt / Jenny Keeton vs Debbie Herring / Jill Pulliam6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJoanne Chambers / Paula Duncan vs Carol Scott / Margaret Dubois2-6, 1-6
2026-03-20vs Vernor/70/3.0/W/TXLost 03
L#1 DoublesElaine Clayton / Rosemary Farrell vs Joann Privitello / Belinda Canonico4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesVicky Hunt / Jenny Keeton vs Joan Millwater / Terry Peel2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJoanne Chambers / Paula Duncan vs Jan Keen / Rosemary Vernor5-7, 2-6
2026-03-20vs Broglio/70/3.0/W/LALost 03
L#1 DoublesElaine Clayton / Rosemary Farrell vs Bonnie Beaullieu / Sandra Huguet5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJoanne Chambers / Paula Duncan vs Vivian Brown / Regina Viator2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesHelen Baggett / Alice Finton vs Pat Ardoin / Gayle Hanks0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · 3.0 (70&O) WOMEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1McCotter/70/3.0/W/LA40102789
2Broglio/70/3.0/W/LA401028107
3Vernor/70/3.0/W/TX31102675
4Wimberly/70/3.0/W/LA31841099
5Cochran/70/3.0/W/LA319311101
6Peterson/70/3.0/W/TX226613101
7Summers/70/3.0/W/MS225715116
8CULVER/70/3.0/W/OK135715109
9Delaney/70/3.0/W/LA134816125
10Childress/70/3.0/W/MS1321021129
11Alleman/70/3.0/W/LA0421021132
12Finton/70/3.0/W/AR0411122134

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.80
Elaine Clayton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Rosemary Farrell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Joanne Chambers
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.68
Vicky Hunt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.57
Paula Duncan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.53
Jenny Keeton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.33
Alice Finton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Helen Baggett
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rosemary Farrell + Elaine Clayton9559% games+4.3% vs expected
Jenny Keeton + Vicky Hunt1738% games−9.5% vs expected
Joanne Chambers + Paula Duncan044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elaine Clayton
9W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
2.80
Rosemary Farrell
9W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
2.80
Joanne Chambers
3W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
Vicky Hunt
2W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
Paula Duncan
0W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
2.57
Jenny Keeton
1W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
2.53
3
Alice Finton
0W–7L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
89%11%<1%
2.33
Helen Baggett
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.