Teams

CULVER/70/3.0/W/OK

70 & Over Adut Multi State Invitaitonal - WOMEN · 3.0 (70&O) WOMEN

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-03-21vs Wimberly/70/3.0/W/LAWon 21
L#1 DoublesBonnie Bell / Bonnie Canfield vs Madeline Cummer / Cynthia Payne3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesVivienne Culver / Sue Zeng vs Reeda Taylor / Susan McFarlain6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesClare Ashby Carpenter / Gayle Johnson vs Theresa Champagne / Ann Wimberly6-1, 6-4
2026-03-21vs McCotter/70/3.0/W/LALost 12
L#1 DoublesSue Zeng / Rebecca Lydy vs M Theresa McConnell / Theia Foley6-1, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesVivienne Culver / Bonnie Canfield vs Sharon Thompson / Linda Causey3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesClare Ashby Carpenter / Gayle Johnson vs Glenda Martin / Georgia McCotter6-3, 6-0
2026-03-20vs Summers/70/3.0/W/MSLost 12
L#1 DoublesVivienne Culver / Clare Ashby Carpenter vs Mary Felder / Rosemary Rushing3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSue Zeng / Rebecca Lydy vs Libby Ford / Judy Quimby6-0, 7-5
L#3 DoublesBonnie Bell / Gayle Johnson vs Peggy Polk / Yvette Lott4-6, 3-6
2026-03-20vs Peterson/70/3.0/W/TXLost 12
W#1 DoublesVivienne Culver / Sue Zeng vs Diann Bennett / Amelia Maxwell6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesBonnie Bell / Rebecca Lydy vs Melinda Ross / Dorothy Peterson1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesBonnie Canfield / Gayle Johnson vs Debra Washmon / Suzanne Middleton1-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · 3.0 (70&O) WOMEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1McCotter/70/3.0/W/LA40102789
2Broglio/70/3.0/W/LA401028107
3Vernor/70/3.0/W/TX31102675
4Wimberly/70/3.0/W/LA31841099
5Cochran/70/3.0/W/LA319311101
6Peterson/70/3.0/W/TX226613101
7Summers/70/3.0/W/MS225715116
8CULVER/70/3.0/W/OK135715109
9Delaney/70/3.0/W/LA134816125
10Childress/70/3.0/W/MS1321021129
11Alleman/70/3.0/W/LA0421021132
12Finton/70/3.0/W/AR0411122134

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.88
Clare Ashby Carpenter
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.79
Sue Zeng
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.70
Rebecca Lydy
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.68
Gayle Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.57
Bonnie Canfield
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.57
Jean Sacra
published
2.56
Vivienne Culver
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.49
Bonnie Bell
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Clare Ashby Carpenter + Vivienne Culver10851% games−1.7% vs expected
Bonnie Canfield + Bonnie Bell141550% games−8.3% vs expected
Vivienne Culver + Bonnie Bell4170% gamesnot enough data
Vivienne Culver + Sue Zeng404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Clare Ashby Carpenter
35W–31L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.88
Sue Zeng
90W–66L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
2.79
Rebecca Lydy
24W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Gayle Johnson
67W–65L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
2.68
3
Bonnie Canfield
38W–30L career · 3 lines in 2026
28%71%<1%
2.57
Jean Sacra
57W–62L career · no lines in 2026
0%30%70%
2.57
Vivienne Culver
86W–65L career · 4 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
2.56
3
Bonnie Bell
32W–31L career · 3 lines in 2026
52%48%<1%
2.49

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.