Teams

Peterson/70/3.0/W/TX

70 & Over Adut Multi State Invitaitonal - WOMEN · 3.0 (70&O) WOMEN

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-03-21vs Alleman/70/3.0/W/LAWon 30
W#1 DoublesDiann Bennett / Amelia Maxwell vs Cathy Moore / Anita Leggett6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRobin Carroll / Jeanne Adams vs Philippa Mueller / Vickey Alleman6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMelinda Ross / Nancy Lowrance vs Marilyn Emfinger / Anna Stutes6-3, 6-2
2026-03-21vs Wimberly/70/3.0/W/LALost 03
L#1 DoublesAmelia Maxwell / Phyllis Jolley Smith vs Madeline Cummer / Cynthia Payne7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDorothy Peterson / Melinda Ross vs Connie Holoman / Laretta Barrow4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesDebra Washmon / Suzanne Middleton vs Frances Pitman / Frances Flores-Odom2-6, 3-6
2026-03-20vs McCotter/70/3.0/W/LALost 12
L#1 DoublesPhyllis Jolley Smith / Diann Bennett vs Theia Foley / M Theresa McConnell2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRobin Carroll / Jeanne Adams vs Linda Causey / Debbie Nealy1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesNancy Lowrance / Melinda Ross vs Sharon Smith / Glenda Martin6-2, 6-4
2026-03-20vs CULVER/70/3.0/W/OKWon 21
L#1 DoublesDiann Bennett / Amelia Maxwell vs Vivienne Culver / Sue Zeng4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMelinda Ross / Dorothy Peterson vs Bonnie Bell / Rebecca Lydy6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDebra Washmon / Suzanne Middleton vs Bonnie Canfield / Gayle Johnson6-1, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · 3.0 (70&O) WOMEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1McCotter/70/3.0/W/LA40102789
2Broglio/70/3.0/W/LA401028107
3Vernor/70/3.0/W/TX31102675
4Wimberly/70/3.0/W/LA31841099
5Cochran/70/3.0/W/LA319311101
6Peterson/70/3.0/W/TX226613101
7Summers/70/3.0/W/MS225715116
8CULVER/70/3.0/W/OK135715109
9Delaney/70/3.0/W/LA134816125
10Childress/70/3.0/W/MS1321021129
11Alleman/70/3.0/W/LA0421021132
12Finton/70/3.0/W/AR0411122134

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.60 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.80
Melinda Ross
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.69
Jeanne Adams
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
Suzanne Middleton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
Amelia Maxwell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.54
Dorothy Peterson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.53
Debra Washmon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.52
Nancy Lowrance
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.48
Phyllis Jolley Smith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.45
Diann Bennett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diann Bennett + Phyllis Jolley Smith0729% gamesnot enough data
Diann Bennett + Amelia Maxwell213 matchesnot enough data
Suzanne Middleton + Debra Washmon123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melinda Ross
16W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.80
Jeanne Adams
17W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
2.69
Suzanne Middleton
5W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.67
3
Amelia Maxwell
17W–19L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
2.67
3
Dorothy Peterson
5W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
2.54
3
Debra Washmon
3W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
2.53
Nancy Lowrance
2W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
2.52
Phyllis Jolley Smith
2W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
2.48
3
Diann Bennett
7W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
65%35%<1%
2.45

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.