Teams

Childress/70/3.0/W/MS

70 & Over Adut Multi State Invitaitonal - WOMEN · 3.0 (70&O) WOMEN

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-03-21vs Vernor/70/3.0/W/TXLost 03
L#1 DoublesDebbie Boykin / Debbie Herring vs Belinda Canonico / Joan Millwater3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJudy Ross / Ann McGee vs Joann Privitello / Rosemary Vernor2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCarol Scott / Margaret Dubois vs Jan Keen / Susan Erhardt3-6, 1-6
2026-03-21vs Finton/70/3.0/W/ARWon 21
L#1 DoublesAnn McGee / Debbie Boykin vs Elaine Clayton / Rosemary Farrell1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesDebbie Herring / Jill Pulliam vs Vicky Hunt / Jenny Keeton3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCarol Scott / Margaret Dubois vs Joanne Chambers / Paula Duncan6-2, 6-1
2026-03-20vs Delaney/70/3.0/W/LALost 03
L#1 DoublesDebbie Herring / Jill Pulliam vs Kay Lambert / Elizabeth Delaney3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCarol Scott / Margaret Dubois vs Jeanie Bastin / Paula Sanchez6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJudy Ross / Ann McGee vs Lorri Mayhall / Rhonda Searcy3-6, 2-6
2026-03-20vs Cochran/70/3.0/W/LALost 03
L#1 DoublesDebbie Boykin / Jill Pulliam vs Shirley Martin / Marlene Fontenot2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJudy Ross / Ann McGee vs Sally Joiner / Kathleen Lowdermilk3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMargaret Dubois / Carol Scott vs Nancy Good / Sharon Boyd3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · 3.0 (70&O) WOMEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1McCotter/70/3.0/W/LA40102789
2Broglio/70/3.0/W/LA401028107
3Vernor/70/3.0/W/TX31102675
4Wimberly/70/3.0/W/LA31841099
5Cochran/70/3.0/W/LA319311101
6Peterson/70/3.0/W/TX226613101
7Summers/70/3.0/W/MS225715116
8CULVER/70/3.0/W/OK135715109
9Delaney/70/3.0/W/LA134816125
10Childress/70/3.0/W/MS1321021129
11Alleman/70/3.0/W/LA0421021132
12Finton/70/3.0/W/AR0411122134

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.81
Debbie Boykin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Carol Scott
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.73
Margaret Dubois
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.71
Judy Ross
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.69
Debbie Herring
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.54
Ann McGee
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.46
Jill Pulliam
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Judy Ross + Carol Scott2351% games−0.3% vs expected
Judy Ross + Ann McGee0530% games−15.4% vs expected
Margaret Dubois + Carol Scott2351% gamesnot enough data
Ann McGee + Debbie Boykin134 matchesnot enough data
Judy Ross + Debbie Boykin213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Debbie Boykin
8W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Carol Scott
14W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
Margaret Dubois
5W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Judy Ross
16W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Debbie Herring
6W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%89%1%
2.69
3
Ann McGee
3W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
2.54
Jill Pulliam
5W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
2.46

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.