Teams

Broglio/70/3.0/W/LA

70 & Over Adut Multi State Invitaitonal - WOMEN · 3.0 (70&O) WOMEN

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-03-21vs Delaney/70/3.0/W/LAWon 30
W#1 DoublesVivian Brown / Regina Viator vs Lorri Mayhall / Rhonda Searcy7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBonnie Beaullieu / Sandra Huguet vs Jeanie Bastin / Paula Sanchez7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPat Ardoin / Gayle Hanks vs Kay Lambert / Debra O'Neil6-4, 6-4
2026-03-21vs Vernor/70/3.0/W/TXWon 21
W#1 DoublesVivian Brown / Regina Viator vs Belinda Canonico / Joann Privitello6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBonnie Beaullieu / Sandra Huguet vs Joan Millwater / Terry Peel0-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPearl Garcia / Peggy Grooms vs Jan Keen / Susan Erhardt6-7, 0-6
2026-03-20vs Finton/70/3.0/W/ARWon 30
W#1 DoublesBonnie Beaullieu / Sandra Huguet vs Elaine Clayton / Rosemary Farrell7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesVivian Brown / Regina Viator vs Joanne Chambers / Paula Duncan6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesPat Ardoin / Gayle Hanks vs Helen Baggett / Alice Finton6-0, 6-0
2026-03-20vs Cochran/70/3.0/W/LAWon 21
W#1 DoublesBonnie Beaullieu / Sandra Huguet vs Kathleen Lowdermilk / Shirley Martin7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesVivian Brown / Gayle Hanks vs Terry Shinn / Pam Haley6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesPeggy Grooms / Pearl Garcia vs Kaye Cochran / Sally Joiner6-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · 3.0 (70&O) WOMEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1McCotter/70/3.0/W/LA40102789
2Broglio/70/3.0/W/LA401028107
3Vernor/70/3.0/W/TX31102675
4Wimberly/70/3.0/W/LA31841099
5Cochran/70/3.0/W/LA319311101
6Peterson/70/3.0/W/TX226613101
7Summers/70/3.0/W/MS225715116
8CULVER/70/3.0/W/OK135715109
9Delaney/70/3.0/W/LA134816125
10Childress/70/3.0/W/MS1321021129
11Alleman/70/3.0/W/LA0421021132
12Finton/70/3.0/W/AR0411122134

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Gayle Hanks
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.88
Peggy Grooms
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Regina Viator
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.85
Vivian Brown
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.79
Pearl Garcia
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Carol Broglio
published 3
2.75
Bonnie Beaullieu
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.67
Sandra Huguet
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
June Thibodaux
published
Pat Ardoin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sharon Fontenot
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bonnie Beaullieu + Sandra Huguet4149% games+2.1% vs expected
Regina Viator + Vivian Brown14654% games−1.9% vs expected
Peggy Grooms + Pearl Garcia3253% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Gayle Hanks
5W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%30%70%
3.07
Peggy Grooms
6W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.88
Regina Viator
14W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
2.86
Vivian Brown
15W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
2.85
Pearl Garcia
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Carol Broglio
3W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Bonnie Beaullieu
8W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
Sandra Huguet
12W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
2.67
June Thibodaux
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Pat Ardoin
2W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sharon Fontenot
0W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.