Teams

The A Team

LCTA 39 & Over Fall League · 39 & over Fall - Women - 3.0 Day

16 players · average NTRP 2.94 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings13 teams · 39 & over Fall - Women - 3.0 Day
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1The A Team000000
2LCTA40/Gressick/Creekside000000
3LCTA40/Evanko/LTPDI000000
4LCTA40/Myrick/CTC000000
5LCTA40/Thorne/DW000000
6LCTA39/Jacoud-Hinton/I'On000000
7WERMUTH000000
8LCTA40/Ait-Lasko000000
9LCTA 39/Parrott/Wild Dunes000000
10LCTA/Buddemeyer/WildDunes000000
11LCTA39/Sandy/SneeFarm000000
12LCTA40/Meares/000000
13LCTA40/Cooke/000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Melissa McKoy
published
3.03
Dara Rosenfeld
published 3
3.00
Maggie Burke
published
2.96
Linda Neill
published
2.96
Denise Samson
published 3
2.85
Allison Shira
published 3
2.82
2.79
McKensie Kish
published
2.76
Dee Dee Joyce
published 3
Cindy Saadeh
published 3
2.73
Ashley Pace
published 3
2.72
Joanne Darkey
published
2.68
Cindy MacCallum
published 3
2.08
Caroline Ledlie
published 2.5
Lauren Hamilton
published
Lori Galyk
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Denise Samson + Catherine Farrell5554% games+8.3% vs expected
Maggie Burke + Ashley Pace1452% games+7.1% vs expected
Melissa McKoy + Denise Samson7259% games+6.1% vs expected
Cindy MacCallum + Catherine Farrell7356% games−0.3% vs expected
Dee Dee Joyce + Allison Shira111348% games−1.0% vs expected
Joanne Darkey + Ashley Pace2548% games−6.3% vs expected
Caroline Ledlie + Lauren Hamilton3344% games−7.4% vs expected
Dee Dee Joyce + Cindy MacCallum2345% games−7.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melissa McKoy
38W–9L career · no lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
3.03
3
Dara Rosenfeld
58W–51L career · no lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.03
Maggie Burke
29W–25L career · no lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.00
Linda Neill
73W–50L career · no lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Denise Samson
50W–38L career · no lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
2.96
3
Allison Shira
75W–51L career · no lines in 2026
<1%87%12%
2.85
3
Catherine Farrell
78W–75L career · no lines in 2026
1%91%9%
2.82
McKensie Kish
42W–25L career · no lines in 2026
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Dee Dee Joyce
83W–95L career · no lines in 2026
2%95%3%
2.76
3
Cindy Saadeh
6W–11L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Ashley Pace
53W–63L career · no lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73
Joanne Darkey
35W–48L career · no lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.72
3
Cindy MacCallum
60W–45L career · no lines in 2026
8%91%1%
2.68
2.5
Caroline Ledlie
50W–48L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Lauren Hamilton
54W–27L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Lori Galyk
42W–21L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.