Teams

LCTA40/Cooke/

LCTA 39 & Over Fall League · 39 & over Fall - Women - 3.0 Day

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings13 teams · 39 & over Fall - Women - 3.0 Day
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1The A Team000000
2LCTA40/Gressick/Creekside000000
3LCTA40/Evanko/LTPDI000000
4LCTA40/Myrick/CTC000000
5LCTA40/Thorne/DW000000
6LCTA39/Jacoud-Hinton/I'On000000
7WERMUTH000000
8LCTA40/Ait-Lasko000000
9LCTA 39/Parrott/Wild Dunes000000
10LCTA/Buddemeyer/WildDunes000000
11LCTA39/Sandy/SneeFarm000000
12LCTA40/Meares/000000
13LCTA40/Cooke/000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.47 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.66
Ashton Kolicko
published 3
2.65
Jaclyn Patterson
published
2.57
Kristen Brueggemann
published
2.55
Brantli McMillan
published 3
2.45
Brandi Cooke
published 3
2.35
Sarah Eargle
published
2.09
Kristi Dodd
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ashton Kolicko + Kristen Brueggemann4642% games−0.6% vs expected
Brantli McMillan + Brandi Cooke404 matchesnot enough data
Sarah Eargle + Jaclyn Patterson224 matchesnot enough data
Brandi Cooke + Jaclyn Patterson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ashton Kolicko
6W–15L career · no lines in 2026
13%86%1%
2.66
Jaclyn Patterson
9W–9L career · no lines in 2026
15%85%1%
2.65
Kristen Brueggemann
8W–26L career · no lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
2.57
3
Brantli McMillan
39W–38L career · type A · no lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
2.55
3
Brandi Cooke
32W–45L career · no lines in 2026
64%36%<1%
2.45
Sarah Eargle
5W–14L career · no lines in 2026
86%14%<1%
2.35
Kristi Dodd
8W–18L career · no lines in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
2.09

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.