Teams

LCTA40/Thorne/DW

LCTA 39 & Over Fall League · 39 & over Fall - Women - 3.0 Day

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings13 teams · 39 & over Fall - Women - 3.0 Day
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1The A Team000000
2LCTA40/Gressick/Creekside000000
3LCTA40/Evanko/LTPDI000000
4LCTA40/Myrick/CTC000000
5LCTA40/Thorne/DW000000
6LCTA39/Jacoud-Hinton/I'On000000
7WERMUTH000000
8LCTA40/Ait-Lasko000000
9LCTA 39/Parrott/Wild Dunes000000
10LCTA/Buddemeyer/WildDunes000000
11LCTA39/Sandy/SneeFarm000000
12LCTA40/Meares/000000
13LCTA40/Cooke/000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.98
Bonnie Hannon
published 3
2.93
Patricia Pretorius
published
2.80
Joanne Rempe
published
2.79
Ann Tinker
published 3
2.76
Veronica Hein
published
2.74
Elizabeth Lierley
published
2.72
Amanda Mammele
published 3
2.72
Trudy Billings
published
2.69
Shivonne Wren
published
2.59
Mary Beth Doyle
published
2.52
Teresa Hildebrand
published
2.51
Donna Condon
published
2.45
Amber Dyer
published 3
Elizabeth Thorne
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Veronica Hein + Amanda Mammele5165% games+17.3% vs expected
Patricia Pretorius + Bonnie Hannon6065% games+9.5% vs expected
Amber Dyer + Ann Tinker1548% games+9.5% vs expected
Bonnie Hannon + Teresa Hildebrand5158% games+7.4% vs expected
Donna Condon + Bonnie Hannon7453% games+3.1% vs expected
Patricia Pretorius + Elizabeth Lierley4256% games−2.4% vs expected
Donna Condon + Teresa Hildebrand1444% games−6.6% vs expected
Trudy Billings + Mary Beth Doyle2840% games−9.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Bonnie Hannon
56W–27L career · no lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
2.98
Patricia Pretorius
47W–45L career · no lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.93
Joanne Rempe
19W–16L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Ann Tinker
55W–85L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
Veronica Hein
60W–49L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.76
Elizabeth Lierley
49W–43L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Amanda Mammele
33W–56L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
Trudy Billings
28W–62L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
Shivonne Wren
14W–12L career · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.69
Mary Beth Doyle
20W–49L career · no lines in 2026
26%73%<1%
2.59
Teresa Hildebrand
34W–50L career · no lines in 2026
46%54%<1%
2.52
Donna Condon
38W–68L career · no lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
2.51
3
Amber Dyer
43W–112L career · no lines in 2026
64%36%<1%
2.45
Elizabeth Thorne
33W–27L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.