Teams

LCTA40/Meares/

LCTA 39 & Over Fall League · 39 & over Fall - Women - 3.0 Day

11 players · average NTRP 2.88 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings13 teams · 39 & over Fall - Women - 3.0 Day
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1The A Team000000
2LCTA40/Gressick/Creekside000000
3LCTA40/Evanko/LTPDI000000
4LCTA40/Myrick/CTC000000
5LCTA40/Thorne/DW000000
6LCTA39/Jacoud-Hinton/I'On000000
7WERMUTH000000
8LCTA40/Ait-Lasko000000
9LCTA 39/Parrott/Wild Dunes000000
10LCTA/Buddemeyer/WildDunes000000
11LCTA39/Sandy/SneeFarm000000
12LCTA40/Meares/000000
13LCTA40/Cooke/000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Mollie Meares
published
3.06
Cate Leatherman
published 3
2.99
Megan Mozingo
published
2.90
Marcia Williams
published
2.79
Mary Mulbry
published
2.75
Elizabeth Settle
published 3
2.46
Hillary Bennett
published 3
2.44
Katie Marko
published
2.27
Jodi Albert
published
Eleanor Gray
published 2.5
Sarah Wendell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Megan Mozingo + Cate Leatherman14368% games+12.2% vs expected
Mollie Meares + Megan Mozingo8363% games+10.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mollie Meares
33W–8L career · no lines in 2026
<1%29%71%
3.07
3
Cate Leatherman
36W–12L career · no lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
3.06
Megan Mozingo
54W–27L career · no lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
2.99
Marcia Williams
18W–26L career · no lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.90
Mary Mulbry
35W–27L career · no lines in 2026
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Elizabeth Settle
36W–45L career · no lines in 2026
2%95%3%
2.75
3
Hillary Bennett
19W–20L career · no lines in 2026
61%39%<1%
2.46
Katie Marko
10W–10L career · no lines in 2026
0%69%31%
2.44
Jodi Albert
13W–20L career · no lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.27
2.5
Eleanor Gray
9W–15L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Sarah Wendell
13W–21L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.