Teams

LCTA 39/Parrott/Wild Dunes

LCTA 39 & Over Fall League · 39 & over Fall - Women - 3.0 Day

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings13 teams · 39 & over Fall - Women - 3.0 Day
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1The A Team000000
2LCTA40/Gressick/Creekside000000
3LCTA40/Evanko/LTPDI000000
4LCTA40/Myrick/CTC000000
5LCTA40/Thorne/DW000000
6LCTA39/Jacoud-Hinton/I'On000000
7WERMUTH000000
8LCTA40/Ait-Lasko000000
9LCTA 39/Parrott/Wild Dunes000000
10LCTA/Buddemeyer/WildDunes000000
11LCTA39/Sandy/SneeFarm000000
12LCTA40/Meares/000000
13LCTA40/Cooke/000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.14
Dawn Parrott
published 3
3.02
Lisa Raess
published
2.96
Brenda McCurry
published 3
2.95
Karen Meredith
published
2.88
Nicole Palame
published
2.88
Sue Wohlford-Bork
published
2.87
Diane Brannigan
published 3
2.85
Lisa Wolverton
published
2.76
Carrie Riddle
published 3
2.69
Ashley Gaston
published 3
2.67
Amanda Oneal
published 3
2.67
2.58
Dede Davidson
published 3
2.56
Jen Mcconnell
published
2.27
Kristen Virgilio
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dawn Parrott + Sue Wohlford-Bork10171% games+10.8% vs expected
Carrie Riddle + Nicole Palame4165% games+8.5% vs expected
Dawn Parrott + Ashley Gaston7264% games+4.5% vs expected
Dawn Parrott + Brenda McCurry14168% games+2.8% vs expected
Diane Brannigan + Sue Wohlford-Bork3255% games−4.9% vs expected
Ashley Gaston + Sue Wohlford-Bork4359% gamesnot enough data
Sue Wohlford-Bork + Brenda McCurry5066% gamesnot enough data
Carrie Riddle + Amanda Oneal4157% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Dawn Parrott
49W–11L career · no lines in 2026
<1%14%86%
3.14
Lisa Raess
7W–0L career · no lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.02
3
Brenda McCurry
42W–13L career · no lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
2.96
Karen Meredith
19W–15L career · no lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
2.95
Nicole Palame
27W–6L career · no lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
2.88
Sue Wohlford-Bork
49W–18L career · no lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.88
3
Diane Brannigan
64W–41L career · no lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.87
Lisa Wolverton
2W–8L career · no lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Carrie Riddle
38W–29L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Ashley Gaston
41W–34L career · no lines in 2026
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Amanda Oneal
19W–8L career · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.67
3
Christy Humphries
25W–44L career · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.67
3
Dede Davidson
40W–29L career · no lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
2.58
Jen Mcconnell
23W–13L career · no lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
2.56
Kristen Virgilio
7W–12L career · no lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.27

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.