Teams

LCTA40/Gressick/Creekside

LCTA 39 & Over Fall League · 39 & over Fall - Women - 3.0 Day

16 players · average NTRP 2.92 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings13 teams · 39 & over Fall - Women - 3.0 Day
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1The A Team000000
2LCTA40/Gressick/Creekside000000
3LCTA40/Evanko/LTPDI000000
4LCTA40/Myrick/CTC000000
5LCTA40/Thorne/DW000000
6LCTA39/Jacoud-Hinton/I'On000000
7WERMUTH000000
8LCTA40/Ait-Lasko000000
9LCTA 39/Parrott/Wild Dunes000000
10LCTA/Buddemeyer/WildDunes000000
11LCTA39/Sandy/SneeFarm000000
12LCTA40/Meares/000000
13LCTA40/Cooke/000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.96
Kady Paradise
published
2.94
Katey Deas
published
2.89
Rebecca Frost
published
2.88
Katherine McDonald
published
2.85
Leigh Dangerfield
published
2.83
Meg Rowley
published
2.82
Coleen Martin
published 3
2.78
Kim Jordan
published
Courtney Lewis
published 3
2.74
Shipley Harper
published
2.73
Gretchen Naylor
published
2.72
2.71
Darci Gressick
published 3
2.69
Charlotte Stein
published 3
2.30
Chelsea Mueller
published 2.5
2.29
Lauren ANDERSON
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shipley Harper + Rebecca Frost7172% games+16.6% vs expected
Courtney Lewis + Rebecca Frost5072% games+13.8% vs expected
Meg Rowley + Charlotte Stein2356% games+11.1% vs expected
Courtney Lewis + Shipley Harper9267% games+10.2% vs expected
Caroline Fitzgerald + Darci Gressick5357% games+8.5% vs expected
Meg Rowley + Kady Paradise7851% games+5.8% vs expected
Charlotte Stein + Darci Gressick2551% games+2.2% vs expected
Meg Rowley + Kim Jordan10263% games+1.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kady Paradise
32W–24L career · no lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
2.96
Katey Deas
30W–19L career · no lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
2.94
Rebecca Frost
36W–10L career · no lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.89
Katherine McDonald
28W–30L career · no lines in 2026
<1%79%20%
2.88
Leigh Dangerfield
49W–44L career · no lines in 2026
1%85%15%
2.85
Meg Rowley
38W–33L career · no lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Coleen Martin
22W–18L career · no lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
Kim Jordan
34W–28L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Courtney Lewis
34W–9L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Shipley Harper
30W–9L career · no lines in 2026
4%92%3%
2.74
Gretchen Naylor
28W–44L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Caroline Fitzgerald
29W–36L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%2%
2.72
3
Darci Gressick
45W–45L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.71
3
Charlotte Stein
35W–43L career · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.69
2.5
Chelsea Mueller
5W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2026
0%92%8%
2.30
Lauren ANDERSON
11W–33L career · no lines in 2026
93%7%<1%
2.29

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.