Teams

CDTA F Combo W7.5 Nielsen Lund Sat 4 $20

CDTA Fall Combo · CDTA Fall Combo W 7.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.86 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 DoublesSuzanne Beu / Jane Girard vs Mary Cooper / Julie Schwan6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesHilary Hoye / Christine Hannafan vs Rita Eichner / Perry Mimms7-5, 4-0
W#3 DoublesKatie Burnside / Rory Hackbarth vs Halle Aten / Allison Milmoe6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesSuzanne Beu / Laurie Schachman vs Marie Dillon / Savanna Rhodes6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJoanne Lund / Hilary Hoye vs Agnieszka Fijol / Sheila Spade6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKatie Burnside / Kelly Matthews-Pluta vs Ela Lewis / Catherine Brink4-6, 5-3, 1-0
W#1 DoublesRachel Stein / Suzanne Beu vs Julie Colhoun / Patricia Nick6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMonique Melnick / Abby Sarnoff vs Gail Wilson / Regina Lookis6-3, 5-2
W#3 DoublesRory Hackbarth / Denise Schneider vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#1 DoublesRosa Broseman / Rachel Stein vs Marina Minkina / Cibele Medrano6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesChristine Hannafan / Monique Melnick vs Kelly Golden / Kathleen Sullivan6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJanine Sheridan / Katie Burnside vs Linda Epstein / Carolynn Carr6-1, 6-3
L#1 DoublesSuzanne Beu / Laurie Schachman vs Nancy Cushing / Crystal Leighton3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAbby Sarnoff / Christine Hannafan vs Maureen Porter / Jackie Smith3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesHilary Hoye / Katie Burnside vs Julie Boruff / Toni Mountcastle6-2, 6-3
L#1 DoublesRosa Broseman / Janine Sheridan vs Marjorie Baltazar / Jean Soh4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMelanie Puljic / Joanne Lund vs Elizabeth Quigley / Laura Knapp6-7, 4-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMonique Melnick / Kelly Matthews-Pluta vs Maria Lobo-Corey / Svetlana Kanev6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · CDTA Fall Combo W 7.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA F Combo W7.5 HealthTrack Kerr Sun 10 $1760171391
2CDTA F Combo W7.5 Nielsen Lund Sat 4 $204213512114
3CDTA F Combo W7.5 MT Bann Cooper Sat 4 $25429921164
4CDTA F Combo W7.5 Tam Corey Fri 7:30 $22339921151
5CDTA F Combo W7.5 Centennial Spade Sun 1 $202461224185
6CDTA F Combo W7.5 Tam McKendry Sun 4 $221551327174
7CDTA F Combo W7.5 Glenbrook Turdo Sat 3 $251541430195

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.20
Jane Girard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.95
Suzanne Beu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.80
Joanne Lund
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Amy Chudgar
published 4
3.71
Monique Melnick
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.69
Laurie Schachman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Hilary Hoye
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.66
Katie Burnside
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.56
Janine Sheridan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.40
Abby Sarnoff
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Kelly Matthews-Pluta
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Denise Schneider
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Rosa Broseman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Christine Hannafan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Melanie Puljic
published
Rachel Stein
published
Rory Hackbarth
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Suzanne Beu + Hilary Hoye5268% games+15.1% vs expected
Joanne Lund + Amy Chudgar21564% games+14.8% vs expected
Joanne Lund + Melanie Puljic13462% games+14.1% vs expected
Hilary Hoye + Melanie Puljic5162% games+12.9% vs expected
Janine Sheridan + Hilary Hoye8657% games+12.0% vs expected
Jane Girard + Joanne Lund6165% games+7.3% vs expected
Joanne Lund + Hilary Hoye5554% games+4.5% vs expected
Denise Schneider + Joanne Lund12261% games+2.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Jane Girard
113W–55L career · 1 line in 2022
6%93%1%
4.20
4
Suzanne Beu
58W–48L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
3.95
4
Joanne Lund
172W–88L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.80
4
Amy Chudgar
27W–15L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Monique Melnick
93W–91L career · 3 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Laurie Schachman
11W–10L career · 2 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Hilary Hoye
82W–55L career · 3 lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Katie Burnside
74W–32L career · 4 lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.66
4
Janine Sheridan
67W–66L career · 2 lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
3.56
3.5
Abby Sarnoff
52W–45L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.40
3.5
Kelly Matthews-Pluta
59W–30L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
Denise Schneider
101W–70L career · 1 line in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Rosa Broseman
58W–40L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Christine Hannafan
5W–2L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Melanie Puljic
51W–26L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rachel Stein
16W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rory Hackbarth
12W–7L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.