Teams

CDTA F Combo W7.5 HealthTrack Kerr Sun 10 $17

CDTA Fall Combo · CDTA Fall Combo W 7.5

17 players · average NTRP 4.00 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 DoublesLorraine Wong / Kristin Lamb vs Gail Wilson / Regina Lookis6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJulie Boruff / ANDREA TAHLIER vs Paula McKendry / Julie Colhoun7-5, 5-2
W#3 DoublesAngela Lukas / Toni Mountcastle vs Elizabeth Berry / Yarina Birnbaum3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCrystal Leighton / Abigail Emerson vs Jill Siegel / Megan Crisham6-3, 6-5
W#1 DoublesMaureen Porter / Amy Williams vs AnneMarie Geary / Sue Christianson6-2, 6-0
W#1 DoublesMaureen Porter / Jackie Smith vs Hoda Elshakankery / Cecilia Lauterbach6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSara Olson / Nancy Cushing vs Angela Anglin Weathers / Tanja Boskovic7-6, 5-3
W#3 DoublesJennifer Peterson / Sue Dedmond vs Laura Purcell / Ryoko Howell7-6, 5-4
W#1 DoublesColleen Stover / Rachel Gabuzda vs Jill Buckley / Dayle Levine6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLorraine Wong / Amy Williams vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#1 DoublesNancy Cushing / Crystal Leighton vs Suzanne Beu / Laurie Schachman6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJulie Boruff / Toni Mountcastle vs Hilary Hoye / Katie Burnside2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · CDTA Fall Combo W 7.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA F Combo W7.5 HealthTrack Kerr Sun 10 $1760171391
2CDTA F Combo W7.5 Nielsen Lund Sat 4 $204213512114
3CDTA F Combo W7.5 MT Bann Cooper Sat 4 $25429921164
4CDTA F Combo W7.5 Tam Corey Fri 7:30 $22339921151
5CDTA F Combo W7.5 Centennial Spade Sun 1 $202461224185
6CDTA F Combo W7.5 Tam McKendry Sun 4 $221551327174
7CDTA F Combo W7.5 Glenbrook Turdo Sat 3 $251541430195

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.16
Jennifer Langtry
published 4.5
4.12
Crystal Leighton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.96
Nancy Cushing
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.95
Colleen Stover
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.89
Sara Olson
published
3.83
ANDREA TAHLIER
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.78
Julie Boruff
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Abigail Emerson
published 4
Jackie Smith
published 4
3.71
Rachel Gabuzda
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Lorraine Wong
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.45
Angela Lukas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.27
Toni Mountcastle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Sharon Kerr-Zygmunt
published 3.5
Kristin Lamb
published
Maureen Porter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sue Dedmond
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sara Olson + Nancy Cushing7079% games+23.4% vs expected
Crystal Leighton + Nancy Cushing7069% games+17.6% vs expected
Maureen Porter + Colleen Stover15269% games+10.6% vs expected
Maureen Porter + Nancy Cushing18461% games+7.5% vs expected
Julie Boruff + Lorraine Wong261356% games+6.2% vs expected
Jennifer Langtry + Crystal Leighton14462% games+3.5% vs expected
Colleen Stover + Nancy Cushing6357% games+1.6% vs expected
Jennifer Langtry + Nancy Cushing17365% games−0.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Jennifer Langtry
254W–112L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
4.16
4
Crystal Leighton
308W–80L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%19%81%
4.12
Nancy Cushing
236W–117L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%62%38%
3.96
4.5
Colleen Stover
89W–46L career · 1 line in 2022
65%35%<1%
3.95
Sara Olson
133W–62L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.89
4
ANDREA TAHLIER
86W–27L career · 1 line in 2022
1%90%9%
3.83
Julie Boruff
123W–83L career · 1 line in 2022
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Abigail Emerson
34W–19L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Jackie Smith
38W–14L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rachel Gabuzda
30W–22L career · 1 line in 2022
5%94%1%
3.71
Lorraine Wong
83W–41L career · 2 lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.60
4
Angela Lukas
106W–140L career · 1 line in 2022
64%36%<1%
3.45
3.5
Toni Mountcastle
235W–198L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Sharon Kerr-Zygmunt
156W–115L career · no lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
3.15
Kristin Lamb
78W–57L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Maureen Porter
108W–28L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sue Dedmond
14W–14L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.