Teams

CDTA F Combo W7.5 Glenbrook Turdo Sat 3 $25

CDTA Fall Combo · CDTA Fall Combo W 7.5

18 players · average NTRP 3.75 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
W#1 DoublesCibele Medrano / Marina Minkina vs Maria Lobo-Corey / Patricia Bustamante6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTammy Holme / Linda Anderson vs Ali Gerstad / Irene Salerno2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesGayle Dominicis / Kelly Golden vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#1 DoublesKaren Kooperman / Kelly Golden vs Tina Dandridge / Angela Anglin Weathers2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJaclyn Levin / Marina Minkina vs Kitty Swanson / Agnieszka Fijol2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLinda Anderson / Judy Caruso vs Catherine Brink / Ela Lewis5-7, 6-7
L#1 DoublesMarina Minkina / Cibele Medrano vs Rosa Broseman / Rachel Stein4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKelly Golden / Kathleen Sullivan vs Christine Hannafan / Monique Melnick3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLinda Epstein / Carolynn Carr vs Janine Sheridan / Katie Burnside1-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesKaren Kooperman / Marina Minkina vs AnneMarie Geary / Sophia Koliatsis2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJill Buckley / Sophie Dimoff vs Leah Starkman / Karen Siegel7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLinda Epstein / Laura Munitz Johnson vs Susan Kalina / Allison Milmoe2-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesJill Buckley / Dayle Levine vs Colleen Stover / Rachel Gabuzda3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLaura Munitz Johnson / Linda Epstein vs Abigail Emerson / Sara Olson1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · CDTA Fall Combo W 7.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA F Combo W7.5 HealthTrack Kerr Sun 10 $1760171391
2CDTA F Combo W7.5 Nielsen Lund Sat 4 $204213512114
3CDTA F Combo W7.5 MT Bann Cooper Sat 4 $25429921164
4CDTA F Combo W7.5 Tam Corey Fri 7:30 $22339921151
5CDTA F Combo W7.5 Centennial Spade Sun 1 $202461224185
6CDTA F Combo W7.5 Tam McKendry Sun 4 $221551327174
7CDTA F Combo W7.5 Glenbrook Turdo Sat 3 $251541430195

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Christina Turdo
published 4.5
4.02
Sophie Dimoff
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Dayle Levine
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Gayle Dominicis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Kelly Golden
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.49
Jaclyn Levin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.32
Carolynn Carr
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Marina Minkina
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.29
Tammy Holme
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Karen Kooperman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Jill Buckley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.21
Laura Munitz Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.20
Yuri Tam
published 3.5
2.88
Judy Caruso
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Cibele Medrano
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Elizabeth Druffel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kathleen Sullivan
published
Linda Epstein
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marina Minkina + Karen Kooperman6647% games−1.4% vs expected
Marina Minkina + Laura Munitz Johnson3547% games−10.0% vs expected
Linda Epstein + Laura Munitz Johnson6541% games−11.6% vs expected
Linda Epstein + Judy Caruso7943% gamesnot enough data
Marina Minkina + Kathleen Sullivan4847% gamesnot enough data
Karen Kooperman + Kathleen Sullivan3942% gamesnot enough data
Linda Epstein + Tammy Holme7457% gamesnot enough data
Tammy Holme + Marina Minkina3547% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Christina Turdo
6W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sophie Dimoff
78W–20L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%45%55%
4.02
4
Dayle Levine
22W–10L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
4
Gayle Dominicis
229W–135L career · 1 line in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
Kelly Golden
49W–31L career · 2 lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Jaclyn Levin
32W–29L career · 1 line in 2022
54%46%<1%
3.49
3.5
Carolynn Carr
15W–12L career · 1 line in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Marina Minkina
90W–129L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Tammy Holme
39W–46L career · 1 line in 2022
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Karen Kooperman
66W–77L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.28
Jill Buckley
108W–100L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Laura Munitz Johnson
38W–59L career · 2 lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Yuri Tam
65W–48L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
Judy Caruso
20W–52L career · 1 line in 2022
81%19%<1%
2.88
Cibele Medrano
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Elizabeth Druffel
9W–2L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Kathleen Sullivan
23W–40L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Linda Epstein
29W–34L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.