Teams

CDTA F Combo W7.5 MT Bann Cooper Sat 4 $25

CDTA Fall Combo · CDTA Fall Combo W 7.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.82 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesMary Cooper / Julie Schwan vs Suzanne Beu / Jane Girard1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRita Eichner / Perry Mimms vs Hilary Hoye / Christine Hannafan5-7, 0-4
L#3 DoublesHalle Aten / Allison Milmoe vs Katie Burnside / Rory Hackbarth3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#1 DoublesAnneMarie Geary / Sue Christianson vs Maureen Porter / Amy Williams2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesPerry Mimms / Karen Siegel vs Jennifer Peterson / Abigail Emerson4-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesJulie Steinberg / Julie Schwan vs Julie Colhoun / Yarina Birnbaum6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHeather Vishnubhakat / Sue Christianson vs Patricia Nick / Gail Wilson4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHalle Aten / Leah Starkman vs Elizabeth Berry / Paula McKendry6-4, 6-0
W#1 DoublesAnneMarie Geary / Sophia Koliatsis vs Karen Kooperman / Marina Minkina6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLeah Starkman / Karen Siegel vs Jill Buckley / Sophie Dimoff5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesSusan Kalina / Allison Milmoe vs Linda Epstein / Laura Munitz Johnson6-2, 6-0
W#1 DoublesSue Christianson / Heather Vishnubhakat vs Jean Soh / Laura Knapp1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJulie Schwan / Julie Steinberg vs Catherine Rigamer / Dimitrina Schoyer6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDiane Egan / Rita Eichner vs Irene Salerno / Angela Hanson5-7, 4-3
W#1 DoublesPerry Mimms / Sophia Koliatsis vs Erica Donofrio / Kitty Swanson6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSusan Kalina / Narissa Breger vs Cate Brodner / Emily Lund6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHeather Vishnubhakat / Diane Egan vs Sarah W Johnson / Miyuki Landt7-6, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · CDTA Fall Combo W 7.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA F Combo W7.5 HealthTrack Kerr Sun 10 $1760171391
2CDTA F Combo W7.5 Nielsen Lund Sat 4 $204213512114
3CDTA F Combo W7.5 MT Bann Cooper Sat 4 $25429921164
4CDTA F Combo W7.5 Tam Corey Fri 7:30 $22339921151
5CDTA F Combo W7.5 Centennial Spade Sun 1 $202461224185
6CDTA F Combo W7.5 Tam McKendry Sun 4 $221551327174
7CDTA F Combo W7.5 Glenbrook Turdo Sat 3 $251541430195

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.16
Perry Mimms
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
AnneMarie Geary
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Sophia Koliatsis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Leah Starkman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.63
Susan Kalina
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.58
Heather Vishnubhakat
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.55
Narissa Breger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.48
Allison Milmoe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.40
Sue Christianson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.38
Diane Egan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Julie Schwan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Halle Aten
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Julie Steinberg
published
Rita Eichner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Kalina + Sophia Koliatsis4264% games+6.2% vs expected
Sophia Koliatsis + Leah Starkman5358% games+5.7% vs expected
Narissa Breger + Leah Starkman8063% games+4.5% vs expected
Sue Christianson + Narissa Breger7857% games+3.6% vs expected
Diane Egan + Rita Eichner261558% games+2.2% vs expected
Sophia Koliatsis + Julie Steinberg7554% games+1.8% vs expected
Sue Christianson + Diane Egan4449% games+1.4% vs expected
Diane Egan + Julie Schwan14460% games−0.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Perry Mimms
120W–59L career · 3 lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
4.16
4
AnneMarie Geary
55W–43L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Sophia Koliatsis
341W–195L career · 2 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Leah Starkman
228W–152L career · 2 lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
3.63
Susan Kalina
52W–41L career · 2 lines in 2022
16%83%<1%
3.63
4
Heather Vishnubhakat
130W–98L career · 3 lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.58
4
Narissa Breger
162W–99L career · 1 line in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.55
3.5
Allison Milmoe
113W–46L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Sue Christianson
214W–169L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.40
3.5
Diane Egan
153W–64L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
Julie Schwan
134W–69L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Halle Aten
72W–51L career · 2 lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
Julie Steinberg
87W–36L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rita Eichner
87W–62L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.